My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2022/06/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
Agenda Packets - 2022/06/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:41 PM
Creation date
6/29/2022 8:54:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/27/2022
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
6/27/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 43, 2022 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />1 sewer line for the individual making the request. He noted the other sewer line would remain as <br />2 is. <br />3 <br />4 Council Member Meehlhause inquired if this work could be completed prior to the work being <br />5 done on Spring Lake Road. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson indicated this <br />6 work would be done while the road was being reconstructed. <br />7 <br />8 Finance Director Beer asked if there would be other private improvements completed on Spring <br />9 Lake Road and why wouldn't they qualify for City assistance. Public Works/Parks and <br />10 Recreation Director Peterson commented he did not know of anyone else participating in private <br />1 1 improvements for sanitary sewer. <br />12 <br />13 Council Member Hull questioned if the City has had this same scenario in the past and asked if <br />14 funding was provided. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson stated the City has <br />15 gotten involved, but the City did not get involved in funding the project. <br />16 <br />17 Mayor Mueller inquired if there had been any other properties within the street projects that have <br />18 had joined sewer lines. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson recalled there has <br />19 been two other properties that had joined sewer lines. <br />20 <br />21 Council Member Meehlhause asked if this work could be funded by the City's zero interest loan <br />22 program. City Administrator Zikmund stated this would be available to these residents. <br />23 <br />24 Mayor Mueller believed the right thing to do was have the sewer line separated and she did not <br />25 believe the residents pushed to have the lines joined when they moved into their homes. She <br />26 appreciated the fact the residents were willing to split the costs with the City. She indicated she <br />27 supported the City spending up to $7,500 in order to separate the sewer lines. <br />28 <br />29 Council Member Bergeron agreed. <br />30 <br />31 Council Member Meehlhause concurred as well, but noted this could start a precedence for future <br />32 requests. <br />33 <br />34 Council Member Bergeron supported the Council reviewing these requests on a case -by -case <br />35 basis and noted he was not concerned about a precedence being set. <br />36 <br />37 Council Member Meehlhause asked how this expense would be funded. Finance Director Beer <br />38 reported the expense would come from the Sanitary Sewer Fund. <br />39 <br />40 Council Member Hull questioned if the City would be opening itself up to a lawsuit from the <br />41 previous cases where sewer lines were joined and the City did not help. City Administrator <br />42 Zikmund stated this matter would have to be reviewed by the City Attorney. <br />43 <br />44 City Administrator Zikmund reported he would speak with the City Attorney and would report <br />45 back to the Council at the June 27 City Council meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.