Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 28, 2022 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />had 255 licensed rental properties that consisted of 1,885 units in the community which housed <br />31% of the City’s population. He stated according to apartments.com, there were 199 apartments <br />for rent in the Mounds View area with multiple options below $1,000. He suggested the City not <br />pursue additional multi-family housing until there was a need. He discussed how many multi- <br />family housing units were being built in surrounding communities. He recommended the City <br />consider revitalizing the current apartments in the community, while also helping to make these <br />buildings more efficient. He stated he was concerned with the multiple exceptions that were being <br />considered for this project and the TIF request. He noted he has talked to many of his neighbors <br />and they do not want this project built. He encouraged the Council to hear the neighbors voices <br />because they were there first and their quality of life matters. <br /> <br />Jonathan Thomas, 8040 Groveland Road, stated this was not his backyard, but he feared how this <br />neighborhood would be impacted if yet another apartment complex were constructed. He discussed <br />how his property was impacted by another apartment building. He encouraged the Council to <br />consider how this large building would impact the existing residential homes. He stated if the <br />Council were to approve a zoning change, this would be difficult to take back. He encouraged the <br />Council to consider the long-term planning for this site as this did not include changing residential <br />zoning to PUD. <br /> <br />Linda Burrows, 5200 O’Connell, stated she built her home in 1969 and three of her neighbors were <br />still the original owners. She discussed how she has been impacted by the traffic changes the City <br />has been making and she feared how this situation would become worse with more traffic along <br />Woodale Drive. She believed the proposed project was a bad idea and encouraged the Council to <br />not support the rezoning. <br /> <br />Rosemary Lensing, 8310 Pleasant View Drive, explained she opposed the rezoning of this property <br />from R-1 to PUD. She did not believe this site should have high density housing and noted this <br />would not encourage community pride. She discussed how this project would impact the school <br />district and police services. She suggested the Council consider how the trees and wildlife in the <br />community would be impacted by the proposed large structure. She noted the City does not have <br />proper public transportation to serve the needs of the residents living in this development. She <br />recommended the Council deny the proposed rezoning because this project would be an excessive <br />burden on the community. <br /> <br />Teresa Leary, 5250 O’Connell Drive, commented she lived next to the senior living facility. She <br />stated she was promised a nice buffer between her home and the senior facility, which amounted <br />to four evergreen trees that were not maintained. She discussed how the workers at the senior <br />facility were smokers at the rear of the building, which impacted the adjacent homeowners. <br /> <br />Nina Dojan, 5259 Greenfield Avenue, stated the tiny neighborhood that this large apartment <br />complex would be going into has had year after year of major construction projects. She reported <br />there are no inlets or outlets except Woodale Drive. She discussed the number of walkers in her <br />neighborhood and how crime was on the rise. She explained this roadway was already stressed <br />and she feared how the roadway would be able to handle another 140+ vehicles. She encouraged <br />the Council to consider how this development would impact the neighbors who live in this area, <br />as well as the number of children who were walking to Edgewood Middle School. She noted this