Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 28, 2022 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />anticipated that most residents in Mounds View did not want this building in their back yard. He <br />encouraged the Council to consider what was driving this project, if it was finances or if it was the <br />highest and best use for this site. <br /> <br />Pat Leary, 5250 O’Connell Drive, indicated many of his concerns have already been stated. He <br />stated this project did not look good on paper, nor would it look good outside of his back window. <br />He did not believe the Gray Stone Flats was an appealing project and feared how the proposed <br />project would impact his neighborhood. He noted the schools were full and the police department <br />was overwhelmed. He recommended the Council deny this project. <br /> <br />Kim Alexander-Susens, 5209 O’Connell Drive, stated she did not want this apartment complex to <br />be approved for many reasons. She discussed the number of trees that would be lost if this <br />development were approved and noted this would be the entrance point to the City. She did not <br />believe the rows and rows of apartments along the Mounds View Boulevard corridor was <br />appealing. She commented on how unsafe traffic already was in her neighborhood and stated an <br />additional 140 apartments with 1,000+ people would only make this situation worse. She indicated <br />the additional traffic would make it incredibly unsafe to walk in her neighborhood. She <br />recommended the Council deny the Woodale Apartment project in order to protect the neighbors <br />who already live in this area. <br /> <br />Ben Sigrist, 5270 Greenfield Avenue, explained he sent the Council an email prior to the meeting. <br />He thanked the Council for hearing the comments from the public. He stated he appreciated the <br />great points that had been made and encouraged the Council to consider how traffic and the lack <br />of access would impact this neighborhood. He indicated the lack of public transportation was also <br />a concern for him. He reported he has worked in supported housing for the last 15 years and he <br />valued affordable housing for individuals that were disenfranchised. He understood housing was <br />a key function to making this society work. He was of the opinion, the surrounding infrastructure <br />could not hold support the proposed number of units in this small space. He believed the proposed <br />building was not a good fit for this site or for the neighborhood and recommended the Council <br />deny the request. <br /> <br />Paul Kroonblawd, 2280 Mounds View Boulevard, stated the property at 2280 has been in his <br />family for 125 years. He explained if the developer gets to Phase II, he would not be selling. <br /> <br />Sherry Nelson, 7555 Groveland Road, stated two weeks ago she spoke about having a desirable <br />and thriving community. She questioned if the City understood the impact the additional 140 units <br />would have on the school district. She noted she was very active when her children in school and <br />understood there was a large percentage of children in the community that were in need of <br />assistance. She discussed how school performance was a direct correlation to property values. <br />She understood people were moving to the community because Mounds View had great schools. <br />She expressed concern with the quality of the water that would be running from this site given the <br />fact the site would be fully covered with asphalt and a building. She questioned what the builders <br />commitment was to the community and asked what the neighbors were getting from this <br />development. She encouraged the City to increase its transparency and communication with the <br />public by offering the pros and cons for this development. <br />