Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council December 12, 2022 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />indicated the redevelopment of these sites would be led by the property owner, a willing developer <br />and the City Council. <br /> <br />Council Member Hull questioned if the City has ever tried to buy these three parcels. Community <br />Development Director Sevald commented he was not aware of the City trying to purchase these <br />parcels. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause stated the Council had three items on the agenda related to Woodale <br />Apartments and action could not be taken on two of the items until the second hearing was held <br />on Ordinance 998. He asked if this was correct. Community Development Director Sevald reported <br />this was the case. He requested the Council hold the first reading and introduce Ordinance 998 and <br />to table action on the Preliminary Plat and PUD/Development Review to December 27. He <br />explained this project required financing from the City, County and State and applications would <br />be submitted to the State the first week in January. He indicated if the Council would like anything <br />changed about this project, the developer would appreciate this being discussed this evening. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause explained the PUD was troubling to him stating he did not <br />understand Item 7 related to the exterior building materials. Community Development Director <br />Sevald explained City Code requires 50% of every exterior wall meets certain standards for <br />exterior material. He noted this building had more than four sides, which made the calculation of <br />this minimum standard difficult. He discussed how a PUD allows for certain deviations from City <br />Code. <br /> <br />Mr. Ackman indicated his intent was to meet or exceed City Code requirements when it came to <br />exterior building materials. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sevald discussed the type of siding that was being used on the <br />building, noting there was a combination of brick, cement board, fiber siding, wood tone siding <br />and architectural metal. He reviewed an exterior materials board in further detail with the Council. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause questioned how the building would be impacted if the City stuck to <br />the 50% requirement. Community Development Director Sevald commented on how the columns <br />on the building would have to be widened in order to accommodate this requirement. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause discussed the amount of tree removal and noted the developer was <br />being asked to provide 57 trees that would be planted elsewhere in the community. Community <br />Development Director Sevald stated with previous PUD’s it was not uncommon to have a <br />deficiency with trees, where more trees cannot fit on the property. Instead of giving these trees up, <br />the City has had developers donate trees for use on public land. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause explained he supported the developer being required to donate <br />additional trees to the City for use on public lands. <br /> <br />Mayor Mueller indicated her feelings have been pretty clear regarding this project. She explained <br />she had difficulty supporting this project when so many of the neighbors opposed and the PUD <br />guidelines were not being followed. She believed the developer was asking for too many