My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2022 CC (2)
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
12-12-2022 CC (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:25:41 AM
Creation date
1/10/2023 2:16:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
12/12/2022
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Minutes
Date
12/12/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 12, 2022 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />Mayor Mueller opened the public hearing at 7:29 p.m. <br /> <br />Bob King, 7408 Silver Lake Road, asked if this project had been cleared with Ramsey County. <br /> <br />Grant Bilski, 5219 O’Connell Drive, commented on the parking numbers that were displayed. He <br />stated 93 spaces were being used for 60 units at the Boulevard. He reported if the same rate of use <br />was followed at the Woodale Apartments, the site would have to have 217 parking spaces for 140 <br />units. <br /> <br />Darrel Rosenthal, 5125 Sunnyside Road, indicated the developer has made it sound like there <br />would not be an appreciable increase in traffic along Woodale Drive. He explained the peak hours <br />for this roadway were from 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and then from 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. He questioned <br />where the Woodale Apartments would access Woodale Drive, noting there was a very short stretch <br />of roadway before the light. He stated this intersection was already a concern because there was a <br />curve. He discussed how Allina Health has an ambulance garage and needs access to the <br />intersection. He feared that if the intersection was jammed up, this would become a public safety <br />concern. He believed there were issues that have not been addressed. He indicated he did not agree <br />with the City offering TIF for this project. He commented on the how TIF was used for the <br />Medtronic property. He stated the long-term value of apartments was not great for the community. <br />He noted apartment buildings also become a burden for the police department. <br /> <br />Kim Alexander-Susens, 5209 O’Connell Drive, stated she appreciated traffic study, but explained <br />she does not come down Mounds View Boulevard in order to make a left on Woodale Drive <br />because only two or three cars can make a left at the light. She feared how the proposed apartment <br />complex would cause a backup on Mounds View Boulevard for vehicles that were trying to take <br />a left on Woodale Drive. She reported the alternative would be that vehicles would take County <br />Road H and would drive behind the Mermaid, through the neighborhood, in order to access <br />Woodale Apartments because it was a shortcut. She discussed how her street was narrowed to <br />assist with slowing traffic, but noted this has not occurred. She indicated residents in her <br />neighborhood have to pay $250 a year to have their child bussed to school for safety purposes <br />because traffic around the school was so dangerous. She explained the apartment complex would <br />push additional traffic onto Woodale Drive, making an already difficult situation worse. She stated <br />she worked in human services and she anticipated the people that live in the proposed apartment <br />complex would have visitors or health assistance personnel visitors from time to time, which would <br />require additional parking spaces. <br /> <br />Tiffany Alexander-Susens, 5209 O’Connell Drive, feared the developer was trying to fit a square <br />peg in a round hole with this development. She reported the developer was requesting seven <br />different deviations from City Code and perhaps another location should be considered for this <br />development. She discussed how the setback on the west property line has been reduced to 26 feet <br />from 40 feet in the original plans. She expressed concern with the fact every tree on the property <br />would be removed. She encouraged the Council to not support this development because it was <br />not a good fit for the property or the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Kim Donley, 5210 O’Connell Drive, stated when people drive into Mounds View it was not a <br />pretty sight, except for the one-half block at Woodale Drive where there is greenspace and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.