Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council December 12, 2022 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />Mounds View, such as well-developed trees and extremely affordable housing. He stated Mounds <br />View was a very desirable community to live in that had major freeway access to both Minneapolis <br />and St. Paul. He encouraged the Council to consider if the additional housing was necessary. He <br />commented on how this neighborhood has been impacted in recent years and feared that the City <br />did not care about this neighborhood. He discussed how the financial benefits offered to the <br />developer would be put on the backs of all Mounds View residents and he did not believe this was <br />fair. He encouraged the City to not support this development or the proposed TIF district. <br /> <br />Pat Leary, 5250 O’Connell Drive, stated his parents moved to Mounds View in 1964 and he <br />attended Edgewood and Mounds View High Schools. He reported these schools did not need more <br />students as they were already full to capacity. He believed the City had enough rental property and <br />he encouraged the City Council to not cram more people into the community on this small parcel <br />of land. He indicated this was an unnecessary project that should not proceed. <br /> <br />Bob King, 7408 Silver Lake Road, stated he has had the feeling that Mounds View puts the cart <br />before the horse. He understood the City can continue to build apartment buildings, but questioned <br />where these residents would find services such as restaurants and grocery stores. He anticipated <br />these residents would move somewhere else in order to be closer to these services. He suggested <br />the Council focus on developing its limited amount of land into the retail services the current <br />residents of Mounds View need. <br /> <br />Zack Lindstrom, 8378 Long Lake Road, thanked everyone for coming forward and voicing their <br />concerns regarding this project. He stated when he was reviewing this project in the packet, it <br />appears the original purpose was to have the property rezoned for a business. He discussed the <br />City’s need for more jobs. He reported in the City’s goals the Council wanted to have a mix of <br />housing types reflective of the needs and desires of the community. He commented, though it was <br />not scientific, a poll was completed online and 214 of 236 people voted against this project. He <br />stated this tells him this project was not something the community was desiring. He encouraged <br />the Council to consider a precedent could be set if this project were approved with seven exceptions <br />and TIF was offered. He asked that the Council be a good neighbor and realize this was not a good <br />project for this neighborhood. <br /> <br />Eileen Burns, 5109 Irondale Road, stated she moved to Mounds View 34 years ago. She indicated <br />she loved the idea of greenspace, trees and wildlife. She encouraged the Council to hear the <br />concerns of the neighbors noting this project was not the right fit for this property and was not <br />right for Mounds View. She suggested the Council not rezone or change ordinances in order to <br />accommodate this project. <br /> <br />Natalie Grosam, 2255 County Road H2, explained she was concerned with the sense of community <br />in Mounds View was being lost. She noted she has lived in Mounds View for less than 10 years <br />and she was ready to move. She reported the teachers in the schools were overwhelmed and stated <br />the City did not need more people and more traffic. She feared that her opinion and the opinion of <br />the neighbors didn’t matter, which was a concern to her. She encouraged the Council to take into <br />consideration how this type of development would impact their home if it was placed in their <br />backyard. <br />