My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2022/11/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
Agenda Packets - 2022/11/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:19 PM
Creation date
1/10/2023 2:31:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/28/2022
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
11/28/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 14, 2022 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />and questioned if the City needed another multi -family development. She feared how her <br />2 neighborhood would be impacted by an additional 600 residents on a small three acre lot. She <br />3 believed her quality of life would be adversely impacted by the proposed four-story building. She <br />4 encouraged the Council to protect her neighborhood and not approve the proposed project at <br />5 Woodale Drive. <br />6 <br />7 Ron Bakke, 5250 Jeffrey, stated he has been a resident of Mounds View for the past 23 years. He <br />8 reported he did not see any benefit from the proposed apartment complex. He encouraged the <br />9 Council to consider how this monstrous building would impact the adjacent neighbors. He <br />10 indicated the traffic would be horrendous for the neighbors living along Woodale Drive. <br />11 <br />12 Teresa Lexcen, 5229 Jeffery Drive, noted she was a 41 year resident of Mounds View. She <br />13 discussed how the proposed density on this corner lot was too much for the area. She indicated the <br />14 corner lot would have two large apartment buildings. She did not believe the proposed <br />15 development was appropriate given the fact this lot was at the entrance to the City of Mounds <br />16 View. She recommended a traffic study be completed for this project and asked why the Council <br />17 was willing to bend the rules for Reuter Walton Development. She questioned why the developer <br />18 has not held any neighborhood meetings. She believed the Council was not being transparent <br />19 regarding this project because there was two buildings proposed and not one. <br />20 <br />21 Doug Donley, 5210 O'Connell, stated he had a large picture window on the back of his house and <br />22 he has enjoyed the view for years. He indicated he would lose the view from his home if the <br />23 apartment complex were approved. He explained he was not against development, but questioned <br />24 if this was the right place for the proposed density. He reported he was concerned about traffic and <br />25 wondered if the schools would be able to take a large number of new students. He stated the subject <br />26 property was currently zoned single family and he wanted to make sure that the City considered <br />27 how this project would impact the single family homeowners surrounding this site. He expressed <br />28 frustration with how the City has kept this project quiet and did not involve the neighbors in the <br />29 discussions with the developer. <br />30 <br />31 Brian Kaden, 7675 Spring Lake Road, commented on the safety concerns he had regarding the <br />32 intersection of Spring Lake Road and County Road I. He explained his son was almost hit by a car <br />33 this morning. He requested the Council reconsider the stop signs at this intersection for safety <br />34 purposes and asked that "Bus Stop Ahead" signs also be installed. <br />35 <br />36 Mayor Mueller stated she would follow up with Mr. Kaden after this meeting to address his <br />37 concerns. <br />38 <br />39 James Range, 5200 Greenfield Avenue, reported he served in Vietnam and noted all he got out of <br />40 it was being looked down on. He understood the school just finished up a large addition and <br />41 explained the site did not have enough parking. He commented on how student parking was <br />42 impacting his neighborhood. He encouraged the Council to consider how this project would <br />43 adversely impact the neighborhood and to not offer their support. <br />44 <br />45 Teresa Leary, 5250 O'Connell Drive, explained her neighbor told her about the public hearing. <br />46 She understood the request before the Council was to amend the official zoning map through a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.