Agenda Packets - 2022/12/27 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council December 12, 2022 Regular Meeting Page 11 Community Development Director Sevald asked if the Council had any specific changes for the 1 project that would add costs. He noted the developer would like this information prior to 2 December 27. 3 4 Mayor Mueller stated there was nothing that would change her mind to support this project. 5 6 Council Member Bergeron requested the Council call the question. 7 8 MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause. To Waive the First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 9 No. 998, Amending the Official Zoning Map for 2310 Mounds View Boulevard, from R-1 Single 10 Family Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development. 11 12 Motion failed for lack of a second. 13 14 MOTION/SECOND: Hull/Cermak. To Deny the First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 15 No. 998, Amending the Official Zoning Map for 2310 Mounds View Boulevard, from R-1 Single 16 Family Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development. 17 18 Council Member Hull stated he was part of the developmental review on this project. He indicated 19 he supported the project being reviewed by the full Council, but understood it would be an uphill 20 battle. He thanked the developers for their work with the property owners and staff. He understood 21 there were some positives to this project, but not enough to force the apartment complex on the 22 neighbors. 23 24 City Attorney Riggs reported if the Council denies the First Reading of this Ordinance, the Council 25 would also have to deny the Preliminary Plat and the PUD/Development Review. 26 27 Mayor Mueller requested a roll call vote be taken. 28 29 ROLL CALL: Bergeron/Cermak/Hull/Meehlhause/Mueller. 30 31 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 32 33 Councilmember Meehlhause stated he was pro-development and supported this project moving 34 forward, but understood the consensus of Council was to not move this project forward. He 35 discussed how this project would need support from both the County and the State before moving 36 forward. In addition, the new Council would have to consider and create TIF financing. He 37 thanked staff and the developer for all of their efforts on this project. 38 39 City Attorney Riggs questioned when the 60 day timeline would expire for this project. 40 41 Community Development Director Sevald reported the timeline had been extended and the 42 deadline was now February 10, 2023. 43 44 City Attorney Riggs explained a statement would have to be adopted by the Council stating why 45 the project was denied. He reported this statement would have to be approved by the Council at 46