My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-11-03 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
2021-11-03 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2024 11:24:02 AM
Creation date
1/30/2023 3:14:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Planning Commission
DOC TYPE
PACKETS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 20, 2021 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />Commissioner Nelson inquired why the contractor did not request a permit for the work. Gary <br />Anderson stated he was a landscaping contractor. He explained he had the understanding the <br />retaining walls and patios were compliant. He reported he subcontracted the concrete work. <br />Commissioner Nelson questioned how the concrete subcontractor was not aware of the fact he <br />would need a permit to pour concrete in the City. Mr. Anderson indicated this may be the case, <br />but noted he was a landscaping contractor and he apologized for this oversight. Community <br />Development Director Sevald discussed how zoning codes vary from city to city. <br />Commissioner Monn asked if the variance was only for the driveway. Mr. Firkus reported this <br />was the case. <br />Commissioner Nelson discussed how zero lot line driveways can be a concern when properties <br />sell or new neighbors move in. <br />Chair Rundle commented if the house were to sell in the next two or three years the variance <br />would remain with the property. Community Development Director Sevald reported this was the <br />case. <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated most driveways receive a four foot variance and not a zero foot <br />setback. However, because the neighbors have a zero foot setback, he could support Mr. Firkus <br />also having a zero foot setback for the driveway. He explained he did not want it to become the <br />norm for residents to request variances after the fact. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Nelson/Commissioner Stevenson. To approve Resolution <br />1139-21, a Resolution Approving a Variance for a Reduced Side Yard Setback for a Driveway at <br />5045 Red Oak Drive. <br />Ayes — 7 <br />Nays — 0 Motion carried. <br />6. Reports <br />A. Upcoming Planning Cases & Activity <br />Community Development Director Sevald discussed upcoming planning cases with the <br />Commission. He explained the Commission would have two items to review at its next meeting, <br />the Skyline property, and to discuss planning commission seats. <br />B. Staff Updates <br />Community Development Director Sevald provided the Commission with an update from staff <br />noting construction would begin shortly on Caribou Cabin. <br />C. Council Updates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.