My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-2023 CC (2)
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
01-23-2023 CC (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:23:46 AM
Creation date
2/22/2023 8:04:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
1/23/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Minutes
Date
1/23/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 23, 2023 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />Police Chief Zender explained the Community Center had been vandalized, in addition to having <br />two other critical incidents. <br /> <br />Council Member Lindstrom indicated the only time the City would need this fencing would be if <br />there was a Mounds View specific incident. Further discussion ensured regarding how the JPA <br />had requested funding from the State which would assist with purchasing the fencing and could <br />assist with lowering the overall expense to the members within the consortium. <br /> <br />Council Member Lindstrom noted the City would be paying for the JPA and would be paying <br />additional fees if the fencing were deployed. Deputy Police Chief Zender reported this was the <br />case. He discussed how the JPA was similar to an insurance policy. <br /> <br />Mayor Hull asked if the officers within the police department supported the fencing consortium. <br />Deputy Police Chief Zender reported the officers were very positive. <br /> <br />Council Member Lindstrom expressed concern with the fact the Public Works Facility may not be <br />protected if a critical incident were to occur in the community. <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn stated she supported the fencing consortium JPA in order to provide more <br />protection for the City’s police officers. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9690, <br />Authorizing the Resolution Adopting the Fencing Consortium Joint Powers Agreement. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />B. Resolution 9694, Local Options Sales Tax. <br /> <br />City Administrator Zikmund requested the Council consider submitting a desire for a local options <br />sales tax to the Senate and House Tax Committee. He explained this was a statutory requirement. <br />He reported the voters would make the final decision on a local options sales tax. He indicated <br />staff was still waiting for clarification on how much a local option sales tax would generate for the <br />City. He commented the City Council would be holding further discussions on how to fund the <br />Community Center expansion project. He stated it was his understanding there were more and <br />more cities utilizing this tool. <br /> <br />Council Member Lindstrom explained he supported the City approving a local options sales tax in <br />order to assist with funding the Community Center expansion. He reported the local option sales <br />tax would provide funding from all people who spend money in the community. He recommended <br />the CSL study be included in the submission to the Senate and House Tax Committee. City <br />Administrator Zikmund reported this information would be provided to the legislature. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Lindstrom. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9694, <br />Local Options Sales Tax. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.