My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:48 PM
Creation date
3/7/2023 10:21:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/3/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
3/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Some haulers operating in these two cities deliver a portion of the wastes they collect to the RRT <br />Resource Recovery facility in Newport and the rest to other locations. These haulers include: <br />Allied Waste Services <br />Aspen Waste Systems <br />Red Arrow <br />Veolia <br />The city of Rochester is located in Olmsted County who has a long history of waste assurance. <br />Olmsted County constructed a WTE facility in the mid 1980's and utilized a designation <br />ordinance to control the flow of waste to their facility. They currently have contracts with all the <br />haulers to deliver MSW to the WTE facility. The contracts were put in place between Olmsted <br />County in lieu of the County districting the County and developing single hauler contracts for <br />collection in each of the districts. <br />The cities of Blaine, Mankato, Minneapolis, St. Cloud and Stillwater are located in counties that <br />have contracts with WTE facilities. Each of the cities is required under the Public Entities Law <br />to follow their respective county solid waste management plan. Each of the counties (Anoka, <br />Blue Earth, Hennepin, Stearns and Washington) has solid waste management plans that call for <br />processing MSW at resource recovery facilities. The cities of Blaine, Mankato and Stillwater <br />have clauses in their respective collection contracts requiring delivery of MSW to the county <br />designated facilities. The cities of Minneapolis and St. Cloud have municipal crews that deliver <br />to the appropriate facilities (the Minneapolis contract with MRI covers the delivery location). <br />4.8 Attempts to Organize <br />The five organized cities all have a long history with their organized systems. Attempts to <br />organize were noted in some of the five open cities. <br />St. Paul <br />The city of St. Paul has always had an open hauling system, even during the period 1970 to <br />1980, when the City actually provided trash hauling service in competition with private haulers. <br />There have been several attempts to convert to an organized system over the years. Recycling <br />collection is organized under a contract with Eureka Recycling. Nevertheless, the City continues <br />to have an open system for garbage. <br />To provide some historical perspective on the topics and past activities, there are five documents <br />from the history of organized collection discussions included in Appendix G. The documents <br />span from approximately 1980 to 1990 and provide a cross section of the history of the <br />discussion of open versus organized collection in St. Paul. Many of the issues of discussion and <br />contention were the same back then as they continue today (choice, traffic, cost, etc.). <br />There have been additional efforts to organize collection conducted at the District Council level <br />in St. Paul. Over the past two decades, there have been isolated but notable examples of <br />individual citizens attempting to "organize" their neighbors into using the same trash hauler on <br />each block or group of blocks. This form of organized collection is generally still based on the <br />authority and choice of individual home owners to contract with their own hauler, but there is a <br />102 •Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC R - Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements.doc <br />June 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.