Laserfiche WebLink
fuel consumption while idling (loading materials). These two consumption values combined <br />provide the fuel use for collection services while actually on a collection route. <br />To develop accurate estimates of existing fuel use in the various open cities, field work was <br />conducted to gather route data. The data collected for haulers in each in-depth open city include <br />a sample of route miles driven, total time on route which is divided into two portions, driving <br />time and loading time. Data was also collected on the total number of households served and <br />total households driven past during the field sample. <br />With fuel consumption averages and the above mentioned data, one can determine the amount of <br />fuel used per household collected. As the percentage of the number of households collected <br />increases, there is greater efficiency in collection and less drive by time. This translates into fuel <br />savings and reduces GHG emissions associated with collection of waste/recyclables per <br />household. With the data collected from field work along with market share data research, Foth <br />determined the relative GHG emissions for existing, open collection systems versus an organized <br />collection system. <br />4.9.1 Background <br />Private hauling companies and municipal hauling organizations keep track of overall fuel <br />consumption as part of the management of operations. Fuel costs are a significant portion of <br />operating costs and somewhat manageable in nature. Haulers have routing software to show the <br />shortest distances necessary to collect waste/recyclables from customers and/or the institutional <br />memory of the organization and route workers to do the same. <br />In order to show differences in fuel consumption rates, the function of driving to perform <br />collections (field collection activities) must be differentiated from the driving to and from the <br />route and driving to disposal facilities (general driving). This differentiation between driving <br />activities must be done to account for the fuel use when collection vehicles are on route (with <br />idling) versus general driving. <br />Research as part of this analysis revealed that the hauling companies and municipal hauling <br />organizations observed were not able to quantify their fuel use differentiated by consumption <br />between field collection activities and general driving. This report concentrates on differences in <br />fuel consumption that exist for the field collection activities of haulers who service only a <br />portion of the households in any area versus the field collection activities of haulers servicing all <br />households. <br />It is important to understand that there is one constant in providing collection services; a vehicle <br />driven at a minimum, from house to house and the vehicle will stop for a brief period of time at <br />every household serviced to perform the loading operation. For purposes of this report, the data <br />for driving between households is referred to as "drive data" and the data for the period stopped <br />and emptying containers is referred to as the "loading data." This analysis demonstrates the <br />measurable difference in providing those services to every household versus serving something <br />less than every household. The data is provided in a relational form. <br />Trying to calculate or report the exact fuel consumption rates for the multitude of actual field <br />conditions and vehicles that occur in the in-depth cities is difficult. Collection vehicles used by <br />106 •Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC R - Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements.doc <br />June 2009 <br />