My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:48 PM
Creation date
3/7/2023 10:21:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/3/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
3/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Comments on Improving Existing Services <br />The municipal survey sought any insight on ways to improve management of collection systems. <br />The billing survey also included an open ended question asking if any changes could be made to <br />help improve the cities' existing MSW and recycling collection services (legislation, incentives, <br />etc.). Some city staff that participated in the billing survey provided opinions on how their <br />existing services could be improved. Below are lists of responses. The lists are separated into <br />sections based on the type of collection systems. <br />Open MSW/Open Recycling <br />Chanhassen <br />• Have more commercial single stream recycling. <br />Richfield <br />• Having a single hauler like Robbinsdale (Waste Management) offers economy of scale. <br />Same hauler (Waste Management) that would charge $5 in solid waste stickers <br />(Robbinsdale program) to remove a small dresser charged me $22 to remove a small <br />dresser in Richfield! This was at time of regular stop. Five dollars of the $22 was a fuel <br />surcharge. I got mad and cancelled service after many years. They (Waste Management) <br />wanted me to talk to a "residential specialist" and offered to reduce or waive the fee. <br />Phooey. I got estimates from competitors and recently went with Burt's Disposal. Then, <br />to remove Waste Management carts they wanted nearly $20 for a cart removal charge. <br />Five dollars of THAT was a fuel surcharge! Fat chance collecting that. This is same <br />company that would have picked up the dresser for $5 in Robbinsdale where I work <br />doing code enforcement. What is so different from Richfield to Robbinsdale and cost of <br />moving a stupid dresser? Problem: People who move from one city to another find a <br />patchwork quilt of refuse hauling systems, programs, costs and ordinances. To have <br />company "A" overcharge some customers as they drive down the alley burning fossil <br />fuels while ignoring a mattress and a sofa at another property not on their customer list, <br />only to have a company "B" truck need to lumber down the alley and remove the <br />mattress but not the sofa. Are waste haulers free to charge fuel or tip your hat surcharges <br />as they see fit? <br />Open MSW/Organized Recycling <br />Big Lake <br />• Make it mandatory that each residence have a recycling container. <br />Plymouth <br />• Organized collection and education for the public on Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle. <br />Roseville <br />• Our service is excellent. We wouldn't do anything to change. <br />• Organize collection with franchise agreement. <br />X:\MS\IE\2008\08M081\l0000 reports\Final Appendices\Appendix E -Participant Comments -Municipal, In-depth and Billing.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.