Laserfiche WebLink
5. Summary, pg 15: The section on "Meeting Public Policy Goals" should be at the end so <br />information on GHG, fuel, and budget constraints for infrastructure and road <br />improvements can be included as bullet points. <br />6. Summary pg 20 and pg 66: In the summary as well as in the report the amount of fuel is <br />compared for the different collection systems as well as the conversion to GHG. Is there a <br />way to put some perspective on this. For example, MNDOT uses x amount of fuel to <br />plow x amount of miles of street for a snowstorm. Or, another example, x many tons of <br />GHG is equal to that of x cars. That would be helpful information. <br />7. Pg 3: In the summary accidents or safety is mentioned as a big concern for many <br />communities when they consider organized collection and sell it to residents. I didn't <br />find much more of it than just a mention here. Pg 41 says it doesn't look at it but when <br />people remember stories of kids being killed by a garbage truck it warrants being <br />considered. <br />8. Pg 4: Add increased illegal dumping in list of disadvantages for an open system. Also <br />Hazardous waste handling is difficult to manage when people don't have a hauler <br />(computers, TV...) <br />9. Pg 6 Table 2-2: Reduced fuel and GHG should be included in list of advantages of <br />organized collection. Below that you list "the primary potential advantages of organized <br />collection are three -fold -lower prices, reduced truck traffic and community control..." <br />Reduced truck traffic in what way? Wear and tear or safety? I would argue that the <br />advantages are the savings of infrastructure and resources (roads, fuel and money) or <br />expand prices as costs to everyone through taxes to improve roads, illegal dumping, <br />pollution... <br />10. Pg 96: alley is spelled wrong. <br />11. Pg 103 Bloomington does neighborhood organizing also with minimal success, primarily <br />is works best in cul-de-sacs. <br />12. Pg 109. The report is not supposed to offer conclusions but I think it would be helpful. Is <br />the message from the field trial study that short distances are more fuel efficient? Then <br />say that and why more clearly and put in summary. Also my Equipment Superintendent <br />had never heard of "Puff Arresters" and when we googled there was no good <br />information. <br />13. Pg I I I Table 4-8 and 4-9: It was difficult to understand what the average observed <br />distances between services households versus average actual distance between <br />households is and why that is important to measure. At the end of pg114 it says that <br />"having the average distance per household with a corresponding fuel consumption rate <br />per household and the exact number of households serviced, the total fuel use by hauler <br />can be computed." Please explain more so it is easier to understand. <br />X:\MS\IE\2008\08M081\10000 reports\Final Appendices\Appendix I1 -Public Comments.doc <br />