My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:48 PM
Creation date
3/7/2023 10:21:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/3/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
3/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NSWMA Comments <br />Page: 2 <br />From a truck emissions standpoint, the Foth report estimates that a reduction of 6,000 metric tons of CO2e could be <br />achieved through organized collection. This represents a minimal emissions reduction of .004 % of the total GHG <br />emissions generated in the state annually. (See the pie chart in Attachment 2 for a relative comparison.) <br />The Foth report also cannot draw the conclusion that higher recycling rates are achieved through organized collection because <br />the data supporting this claim covers a timeframe of only one year, draws from a small sample, does not differentiate between <br />dual sort and single sort programs, and the increased recycling may be due to a variety of other factors other than organized <br />collection. Further, the minor differences in tonnage clearly do not warrant the report recommendation for organized collection. <br />Nevertheless, the report repeatedly advocates for organized collection as a means to achieving higher recycling rates and leaps <br />to the conclusion that an additional 32,000 metric tons of CO2e would be reduced in the Twin Cities Area (Page 66 of the <br />report) through higher recycling rates due to organized collection. <br />These reductions would be minor in comparison to the overall reduction that could be achieved if we focused our <br />resources on getting residents and businesses to reduce the amount of waste they generate (20,000,000 metric tons of <br />CO2e reduced) and recycle more material from the waste stream (45,000,000 metric tons of CO2e reduced). Even if this <br />were an accurate conclusion, the resulting emissions reduction from increased recycling is .022% of the total GHG <br />emissions generated in the state annually. <br />Concluding Comments: <br />The question then becomes, why advocate for organized collection and at what cost do cities organize collection, resulting in <br />increased administrative, regulatory and enforcement costs, for the small benefit in terms of GHG emissions reduction gained? <br />There is no evidence supporting the claim that organized collection results in higher recycling rates and, the GHG reductions <br />estimated by Foth are unsubstantiated. It is perplexing, that the high level conversation held at the MCCAG that resulted in <br />goals for the entire transportation sector has now turned into an effort to target a relatively small contributor to the overall <br />climate change picture, for very little gain. <br />Lastly, although we respect the diversity of opinions on solid waste issues, we continue to be frustrated by the indifference to <br />the history of the private sector's efforts and role in developing the waste and recycling collection systems in Minnesota. As an <br />industry, we have invested millions of dollars towards the development of the recycling system and have been major <br />contributors to achieving the state's high recycling rate. Our industry has taken the initiative to explore alternative fuels and <br />emissions reduction technologies and provides jobs that contribute to the state economy. <br />The waste industry in Minnesota fully recognizes that our trucks generate emissions and contribute a small percentage to the <br />overall 18% of emissions generated by all diesel trucks. And, we fully recognize the need for all of the trucking industry to <br />work towards reducing GHG emissions in the state. For that reason, past members of the NSWMA have participated in Project <br />Green Fleet, retrofitting our trucks for emissions reduction purposes and we have initiated discussion with the Minnesota <br />Environmental Initiative (MEI) as a potential candidate for further work in this area. Members of NSWMA have anti -idling <br />policies, daily pre and post trip inspections to ensure optimum engine performance, and routing software to ensure maximum <br />fuel efficiency. <br />Our industry has taken measures to protect the environment because the competitive marketplace has driven innovation and <br />value. Each of us tries to be the best service provider in order to stay in the business, and that means that we compete to be <br />leaders on issues that our customers and the marketplace demand. In Minnesota, that means the waste industry must give <br />serious consideration to environmental issues and our business decisions reflect a balance amongst environmental <br />considerations, priorities and cost. <br />Our industry delivers the best possible value to our customers in terms of service, environmental protection and price. It is <br />concerning that this report fails to acknowledge that the loss of the open market system will stifle innovation, reduce the <br />1163 E. Odgen Avenue, Suite 705, PMB 313, Naperville, IL 60563 <br />800-679-6269 630-848-1101 630-848-1102 fx <br />www.nswma.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.