Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />If a city is considering entering into an agreement for the collection of <br />recyclable materials with one collector or an organization of collectors, it <br />should consult its city attorney to determine whether it must follow the <br />procedural requirements in the organized collection statute. <br />B. Organized collection is generally optional <br />Minn. Star. § 115A.94, subd. <br />The organized collection statute provides that the authority to organize the <br />6. <br />collection of solid waste is optional and is in addition to authority governing <br />solid waste collection granted by other law. The statute also provides that a <br />city may exercise any authority granted by any other law, including a home <br />rule charter, to govern collection of solid waste. A city would only be <br />required to organize collection if the county in which it is located has by <br />ordinance required cities within its jurisdiction to organize collection. <br />Minn. Stat. § 115A.03, subd. <br />The Waste Management Act defines cities as "statutory and home rule <br />4. Minn. Star. § 115A.94. <br />charter cities authorized to plan under sections 462.351 to 462.364." <br />Therefore, both statutory and home rule charter cities may adopt organized <br />collection using the procedures outlined in the organized collection statute. <br />Jennissen v. city of <br />The Minnesota Supreme Court has held that the Waste Management Act <br />Bloomington, 913 N.W.2d <br />456 (Minn. 2018). Clark v. <br />does not preempt home rule charter cities from regulating the process for <br />City of Saint Paul, 934 <br />organizing the collection of solid waste. Instead, the Supreme Court <br />N.W.2d 234 (Minn. 2019). <br />Jennissen v. City of <br />concluded that the Act establishes the minimum procedural requirements <br />Bloomington, A17-0221 <br />that cities must follow before adopting organized collection, and that home <br />(Minn. 2020). <br />rule charter cities may be subject to additional procedural requirements, <br />including those adopted through a citizen petition for a referendum or for a <br />proposed charter amendment. <br />C. Open collection versus organized collection: <br />pros and cons <br />1. Open collection <br />Analysis of waste Collection <br />There are several frequently cited advantages of open collection: <br />Service Arrangements, <br />Minnesota Pollution Control <br />Agency, June 2009. <br />• Residents have more choice and are free to select a solid waste collector <br />based on their preference. <br />• There is a direct relationship between the solid waste collector and its <br />customers. <br />• There are minimal administrative costs for cities. <br />• Smaller solid waste collectors are better able to enter the market in an <br />open collection system by servicing a portion of city residents. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 6/9/2022 <br />City Solid Waste Management Page 13 <br />