My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:48 PM
Creation date
3/7/2023 10:21:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/3/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
3/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2 Literature Review <br />This section provides a summary of pertinent literature regarding residential waste and <br />recyclable materials collection arrangements, and past and current efforts to establish organized <br />collection arrangements within Minnesota municipalities and counties. The section includes: <br />A summary of the primary issues related to municipal waste and recyclable material <br />collection services in open collection and organized collection systems for residential <br />generators including the commonly identified advantages and disadvantages of each <br />system. <br />Information from areas outside of Minnesota related to open collection and organized <br />collection systems such as the occurrence of each and efforts to organize in other <br />communities. <br />Experience of Minnesota cities with the Organized Collection statutes. <br />Literature research information available on issues such as cost and pricing of services, <br />volume based pricing and waste generation, associated performance and results of open <br />collection and organized collection arrangements, transportation costs, research or <br />information regarding infrastructure costs to roads and bridges, externalities such as air <br />pollution, accidents and safety. <br />A summary of position of various interest groups such as National Solid Wastes <br />Management Association (NSWMA), representatives from Minnesota Counties, the <br />League of Minnesota Cities, and other professional organizations <br />2.1 Commonly Identified Advantages/Disadvantages of Types of <br />Collection Systems <br />There are several characteristics of open and organized collection systems that have been <br />routinely identified in different communities as potential advantages or disadvantages for each. <br />The advantages are sometimes referred to as potential benefits and the disadvantages as potential <br />issues/concerns. These are highlighted in the next subsection with some covered in more detail <br />in the following subsections. <br />Generally, the proponents of organized collection include cities, counties, and state solid waste <br />management officials. Proponents of open collection systems are primarily private waste <br />management companies including both the larger, national companies as well as local, <br />independent haulers. Proponents of open systems also include residents desiring to retain the <br />ability to choose their waste hauler. <br />2.1.1 Open Systems <br />A comparison of the advantages (potential benefits) and disadvantages of open collection <br />systems is shown in Table 2-1. <br />R - Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements.doc Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC • 3 <br />June 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.