My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:48 PM
Creation date
3/7/2023 10:21:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/3/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
3/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The text associated with the Minnesota Attorney General's Report points out another interesting <br />variation. The Attorney General Report was compiled by the Antitrust Division who studied 13 <br />Ramsey and Washington County municipalities with organized collection. The report concluded <br />that maintaining cost-effective rates are not only a function of organizing collection, but also <br />very dependent on the method of contractor procurement. Communities that maintained <br />continued relationships with existing haulers were paying between 17.6% and 48.5% more than <br />communities that competitively select haulers. Thus, to help fully take advantage of the <br />efficiencies of organized collection, municipalities should not simply continually negotiate a <br />contract extension with the existing hauling company. A competitive procurement process keeps <br />the contract costs in line with other market pricing. <br />Exhibit 2-2 Financial Issues Related to Public Collection21 <br />Appendix 14 Financial Issues Related to Public Collection — (excepted from <br />Ramsey/Washington counties report). <br />This study did not include a detailed look at waste collection pricing in Ramsey and Washington <br />Counties. It did gather information on what a few communities had recently prepared on the <br />issue of waste collection, and some information from two studies conducted in 1993. <br />Oakdale Survey <br />The city of Oakdale staff in 2001 surveyed 14 cities with a variety of collection systems for <br />residential trash and recycling. Rates were tabulated for small (30-gallon) medium (60-gallon), <br />and large (90-gallon) size trash cans, including recycling service. Can sizes, other than 30, 60 <br />and 90 gallon, were grouped in the closest size category. Other services, such a yard waste <br />pickup, and special rates, such as for seniors, were excluded to the degree possible so that the <br />data are comparable. <br />27 Ibid. <br />32 •Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC R - Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements.doc <br />June 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.