Laserfiche WebLink
ATTENTION: This message, any information contained in this message, and any attachments are intended only for the <br />use of the named recipient(s), and may contain information that is confidential, privileged, attorney work product, or <br />exempt or protected from disclosure under applicable laws and rules. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are <br />notified that the dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you <br />receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender at either the e-mail address or <br />the telephone number included herein and delete this message and any of its attachments from your computer and/or <br />network. Receipt by anyone other than the named recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney -client, work product, or <br />other applicable privilege. This message and any attachments are covered by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, <br />18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521. <br />-----Original Message ----- <br />From: Nyle Zikmund <nyle.zikmund@moundsviewmn.org> <br />Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 6:55 AM <br />To: Sathe, Joseph L. <JSathe@Kennedy-Grave n.com> <br />Cc: Riggs, Scott J. <sriggs@Ken nedy-Graven.com> <br />Subject: FW: Quick question please <br />Can you please me on my response to #2 and #3 <br />Thank you. <br />I responded to her last Thursday on #1 and advised, since I was off, #2 and #3 would be this week <br />-----Original Message ----- <br />From: Valerie [mailto:vamundsen@yahoo.com) <br />Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 3:25 PM <br />To: Nyle Zikmund <nyle.zikmund@moundsviewmn.org> <br />Subject: Quick question please <br />Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. <br />Good Afternoon Nyle, <br />Could you please clarify a few things for me, this afternoon, before you depart for the weekend please, as it relates to <br />the issue we spoke to on Monday. <br />1) Regarding the Charter Amendment that was voted on by the Council on Monday, there is conflict in the Council <br />packet regarding the Ordinance number. On the agenda it is stated as ordinance # 984. However in the packet <br />materials (the official ordinance verbage) , it is named as ordinance # 987. <br />1 believe 984 to be correct, but wanted you to confirm that please. <br />Which is it? <br />2) Also, what will be the date of publishing of this ordinance. I know that the 60 days for petition starts at the date of <br />publishing. <br />On the ordinance page in the packet it states it will be December 21, but since the ordinance number is wrong, I want to <br />be sure that this date is correct. <br />3) Assuming Dec. 21 is the date of publication, could you please advise on the exact date you calculate to be the <br />deadline for a petition submission? <br />