Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> v <br /> City of <br /> Mounds <br />View <br />Charter Commission <br />Ch air <br />Jonathan J Thomas <br />763-784-5205 <br />Vic e C hair <br />M ichele Sandback <br />763-783-1770 <br />2nd Vice Ch air <br />Daniel Freimuth <br />763-780-3371 <br />Secretary <br />Brian Amundsen <br />763-786-5699 <br />M ary Amirahmadi <br />763-786-3477 <br />Bill Doty <br />763-786-3421 <br />Brad ley Jahnke <br />763-780-4900 <br />Daniel Sach Le <br />763-783-5943 <br />Sharon L Linke <br />763-786-4696 <br />Dana M andoza <br />763-784-8942 <br />Duan e M cCarty <br />763-784-6074 <br />Jean M iller <br />763-786-3959 <br />William Mori <br />763-784-3645 <br />Roger Stigney <br />763-786-3156 <br />William Werner Sr <br />763-784-3603 <br />Mounds View Charter Commission <br />Feb 13, 2003 <br />Preliminary <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Attention: City Clerk-Administrator <br />Mounds View City Hall <br />Honorable Mayor and Mounds View City Council: <br />At the Nov 14, 2002, meeting of the Mounds View Charter Commission, a member of the <br />Commission that is also a member of the Police Civil Service Commission presented an issue <br />relating to the interpretation of the Mounds View Charter, Section 2.02. The Charter <br />Commission has determined at its Jan 9, 2003, meeting that there is sufficient cause to render <br />its opinion to you on the matter of the validity of the Police Civil Service Commission <br />providing an administrative function for the city under the current wording of the Charter. <br /> <br />We would like to note that although the Commission provides its opinion on such matters, <br />the City Council and its legal counsel have the responsibility to interpret the Charter on <br />behalf of the City. This was affirmed by Mr. Duke Addicks, an attorney for the League of <br />Minnesota Cities, in his presentation before this Commission on June 14, 2001. <br />It is the Charter Commission's opinion that Section 2.02 does appear to be in conflict with the <br />existence of any appointed commission that would serve in an administrative role. It was <br />also noted that the Police Civil Service Commission was formed and has served continuously <br />since prior to the Charter and that in over twenty years it has not been challenged. <br />The Charter Commission reviewed this issue on Thursday, January 9, 2003, and requests that <br />the City Council provide direction to the Charter Commission for our future consideration to <br />pursue one of the following options or other options the City Council may find appropriate. <br />!The City Council could request that the Charter Commission review Section 2.02 of the <br />Charter specifically excluding the Police Civil Service Commission and such other <br />commissions as it may deem necessary, from the restriction of not allowing any <br />commissions that would serve in an administrative function. <br />!The City Council could abolish the Police Civil Service Commission defined by <br />Section 404 of the City Code and Minnesota Statute 419.16 which according to <br />Minnesota Statute 419.16 would require a unanimous vote of the City Council. Then <br />the City Council could amend Section 404 of the City Code to create an advisory only <br />Police Civil Service Commission. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Jonathan Thomas, Chair Brain Amundsen, Secretary <br />Mounds View Charter Commission