My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-2006 K & G Memo on Holding Office
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Correspondence
>
01-23-2006 K & G Memo on Holding Office
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 10:32:56 AM
Creation date
3/9/2023 10:32:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Charter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MU210-4 <br /> <br />It should be noted that this provision of Minnesota Statute Section 410.05 was amended <br />on August 1, 2004. Prior to that, it read “[n]o person shall be disqualified from serving on a <br />charter commission by reason of holding any other elective or appointive office other than <br />judicial.” Minn. Stat. § 410.05, subd. 1 (2004). It would have been permissible in 2004 for a <br />City Councilmember to also serve on the Charter Commission, even though Section 2.04 of the <br />Charter existed. However, notwithstanding the recent statutory change to Minn. Stat. § 410.05, <br />subd. 1, it is questionable whether the statutory change applies to an individual presently serving in <br />the capacity of a council member and a charter commission member as the charter provision in <br />question was adopted prior to the effective date of the statutory change that provided the authority <br />for a city charter to prohibit such dual service in municipal office. The Charter provision in <br />question should likely not be given any effect unless properly readopted. In addition, City Council <br />members have served on the Charter Commission in the past. It is therefore questionable <br />whether the intent of Section 2.04 of the Charter was to prevent Council members from serving <br />on the Charter Commission. <br /> <br />Based on the above past history and the new statutory language, it would be <br />recommended that if the City would like to continue in the future to allow a Councilmember to <br />serve on the Charter Commission, that it amend the Charter in order to make it clear that it does <br />not apply to this situation. If the City does not wish to amend its Charter, another option may be <br />to request an opinion on this issue from the Attorney General. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.