My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Frivolous Petition report - Sept 24, 2007
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Correspondence
>
Frivolous Petition report - Sept 24, 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2023 10:40:21 AM
Creation date
3/9/2023 10:34:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Charter Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 7B <br />Meeting Date: 09-24-07 <br /> Type of Business: CB <br />Administrator Review: _______ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Jim Ericson, Interim City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Discuss Resolution 7158 Establishing the Process for Determining the Sufficiency of Petition Pursuant to City Charter <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />With the adoption of Ordinance 790 by the City Council on July 23, 2007, the following language was added to the Charter: <br /> <br />“Consistent with the provisions of this Charter and the applicable state laws and rules, the Council may prescribe by ordinance or resolution, the definition of a frivolous petition.” <br /> <br />At that meeting, the City Attorney provided a draft of a resolution (attached) that would be adopted by the Council in order to provide a definition of a “frivolous” petition. The resolution <br /> was reviewed in greater detail at the City Council’s August 6 worksession. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Based upon discussion that occurred at Council meeting on July 23 and August 6, the following characteristics were reviewed and considered by the City Council to define such frivolous <br /> petitions: <br /> <br />The apparent number of signatures must match the number of signatures required to have a valid petition. <br /> <br />All signatures used to calculate the necessary number of signatures must be original signatures (i.e. not photo copies). <br /> <br />All signature pages used in the calculation are in the proper form with the petition language clearly stated on each page. <br /> <br />The required information regarding the sponsoring committee members must be present. <br /> <br />That at least eighty percent of the required signatures must be legitimate on their face or upon validation. <br /> <br />The final characteristic was discussed at length during the August 6 worksession and relates to those signatures deemed not legitimate either on their face (e.g., cartoon characters, <br /> non-living persons, children) or after validation. Based on this final characteristic, a petition could appear valid at first glance and proceed to the sufficiency stage, but if twenty <br /> percent (or more) of the signatures are found to be invalid or non-legitimate, the petition would be deemed frivolous rather than insufficient. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.