My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Memo to Council - May 3, 2010
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Misc.
>
Memo to Council - May 3, 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2023 3:49:08 PM
Creation date
3/15/2023 3:47:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Charter Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 1 <br />Meeting Date: May 3, 2010 <br />Type of Business: Work Session <br />Administrator Review: ____ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Clerk - Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Joint Meeting with the Charter Commission Regarding Chapter 8 <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />The Charter Commission has been discussing potential changes to the Charter in Chapter 8 relative to Special Assessments and Local Improvements. The Commission feels that the Chapter <br /> no longer functions as it was originally drafted and requires substantial revisions to re-establish mechanisms to petition against a city project. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Members of the Commission have stated that since the City has found a way to pay for the street improvement program through methods OTHER than special assessments, the street projects <br /> are longer “petitionable” and thus the Charter needs to be rewritten to allow for this to occur. In addition, the Commission believes that the scope of the Charter should be expanded <br /> to allow residents to petition for projects REGARDLESS of whether assessments are used. Staff asserts that Chapter 8 works as it was originally intended and that there is no need to <br /> rewrite the chapter or enhance the scope of the rights afforded to the residents. The Commission feels that the “project by assessment” financing methodology will never be used again, <br /> which is not true. While the City has been fortunate to be able to finance the present street program without assessments, the financing is one-time only money and future reconstruction <br /> projects would likely necessitate direct assessments. It would seem unnecessary to revise the Charter because seven projects have been financed without assessments. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Discuss with the Charter Commission its proposal to rewrite Chapter 8 to allow residents to petition AGAINST projects regardless of whether special assessments are used and to expand <br /> the Charter to allow residents the right to petition FOR projects regardless of whether special assessments are used. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />Clerk – Administrator <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.