My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Charter Commission Meeting - Oct 10 12 2012
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
Misc.
>
Charter Commission Meeting - Oct 10 12 2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2024 9:42:55 AM
Creation date
3/15/2023 3:56:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Charter Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
such as testing 20% of stormwater ponds on an annual basis, or inspecting 25% of the rental units on <br />an annual basis, or striping 30% of the roads on an annual basis, or seal -coating roads every five <br />years, etc. <br />While I did not want to address procedural issues, I'll make just one statement (assuming anyone is <br />still reading at this point): As was stated at a recent Charter Commission meeting and as proposed in <br />the draft provisions to Chapter 8, one intent of the Commission in revising this Chapter is to empower <br />residents with the ability to petition against a street project despite there being no special <br />assessments. Has the Commission discussed the rationale behind why an expansion of the right to <br />petition is warranted? <br />In conclusion (I know, FINALLY, you think!) I look at Chapter 8 as a complex series of interwoven <br />controls relating to public improvements delicately balanced upon the premise of special <br />assessments. If you remove the special assessment linchpin, and in its place insert something <br />different, the entire chapter begins to wobble under the weight of unintended consequences. It would <br />almost make more sense to leave the chapter as it is, and simply create a NEW section to address <br />the process/procedure for projects that do NOT incorporate assessments (in part or whole) as a <br />funding source. That way, the integrity of the chapter relating to special assessments is preserved <br />while at the same time resolving the perceived need to address projects NOT funded through special <br />assessments. I know the Commission has already invested significant time into the proposed <br />revisions and I do not mean to minimize or dismiss any efforts up to this point, I simply offer the <br />suggestion as an alternative for your collective consideration moving forward, with all due respect. <br />If anyone has questions, feel free to call or write. I'll plan on attending the next meeting if anyone <br />feels that would be helpful. <br />Again, sorry for the prolific message. <br />Best regards, <br />Jim Ericson <br />City Administrator <br />City of Mounds View <br />2401 County Road 10 <br />Mounds View, MN 55112 <br />763-717-4001 (Phone) <br />763-717-4019 (Fax) <br />763-464-9644 (Cell) <br />www.ci.mounds-view.mn.us (Web) <br />BCC: City Council <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.