My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
July 8 Draft Letter_to_Judge_regarding_Charter_Commission Brian Amundsen
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
Misc.
>
Membership Issues Removal Documents
>
Archive
>
July 8 Draft Letter_to_Judge_regarding_Charter_Commission Brian Amundsen
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2023 12:17:17 PM
Creation date
3/20/2023 12:12:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Charter Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />In the fall of 2016, two more Commission members were added bringing the total to 5. In 2017, the Commission again changed its bylaws further reducing its membership from 11 to 9 members. <br /> Through extensive efforts by Council and City staff, the Commission achieved 8 members at the end of 2018. In January of 2019, the Commission achieved a full complement of members, <br /> and for the first time in more than a decade, had a full Commission present for its 2019 meetings. Unfortunately, with the resignation of Chair Reyes-Johnson and the pending resignations <br /> of two more Commission members, the Commission will once again revert to times past. <br /> <br />Included with this correspondence is the unapproved minutes of the most recent Commission meeting; however, if so inclined, the video is available on the City’s web page at https://webstreaming.ctv15 <br />.org/viewer.php?streamid=3589. The video arguably provides a more descriptive display of body language, voice modulation, and inflection of Commission members. <br /> <br />The combination of this Commission membership turnover, when combined with a focus on minutia, extreme formality, and substantive resistance to change/suggestions by Mr. Amundsen as <br /> well as repeated rejection of City Attorney advice, has/will have a compound negative impact. Attached is a document illustrating the current Commission membership revealing most members <br /> abundant with minimal service. Effective public policy adoption and Charter updates simply fail as meetings are monopolized by reliving the previous Commission meetings. By way of <br /> example, the annual reports submitted to the Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes reveal that the Commission spent 8-plus years (69 meetings) discussing issues related to revising Chapter <br /> 8 of the Charter. The attached flow chart produced by the Commission for Chapter 8 illustrates both the minutia as well as the failure to create a Charter that is simple to read and <br /> easy to understand. Similarly, but less egregious, was the recent Commission task of reviewing Chapter 4 of the Charter (special election if a vacancy occurs) which traversed an 18-plus <br /> month journey (this review and proposed language revision is ongoing). In both cases, Council had advocated for a “simplification” of Charter language as a component of the Commission’s <br /> work product. <br /> <br />The dysfunction of the Charter Commission for more than a decade continues to prohibit the Council and the City from realizing the necessary contributions of the Commission and the willing <br /> members that have stepped forward to serve the community. The Council’s analysis, observations, review and discussions lead it to the unfortunate but necessary conclusion that the <br /> removal of Mr. Amundsen is necessary for the success of the Commission and the City. The consequences of failing to take this action will result in a continuation of past Commission <br /> practice and dysfunction. The most recent events involving the Commission provide extreme clarity on this point. <br /> <br />The situation if further exacerbated as Mr. Amundsen has stated to City Administrator Zikmund that he has “hidden or ulterior” motives with him former vowing to watch his every move. <br /> Thus, in conjunction with the indifference towards advice from the City Attorney (who is council to the Commission) the relationship with City Staff is something less than desirable. <br /> <br />In closing, the Mounds View City Council has minimal desire to cast deleterious aspersions a long serving individual of the community and prefers to focus on the viability of a functioning <br /> Charter Commission body. The City’s Planning and Zoning Commission, Parks, Recreation and Forestry Commission, and Economic Development Commission all operate with stability, a high <br /> degree of functionality and productivity. This is critical to good government and policy making. <br /> <br />Attached to this correspondence please find the following:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.