Laserfiche WebLink
me to City Attorney, that deceptively omits the last part of my email, which confirms City Attorney and <br />I had a congenial relationship. <br />The Plaintiff points to Mr. Meehlhause's testimony where he stated that he observed Commission's <br />conduct, but Meehlhause actually simply testifies that he has "attended meetings" and only spoke once <br />(Tr. Pg. 45, 23 to Tr. Pg. 46, 3). City Council member Meehlhause does not testify about observing <br />meeting conduct or any member's individual conduct. In fact, the Court did not hear testimony <br />describing what conduct was observed. In addition, Mr. Meehlhause testified that he did not know the <br />statutes or bylaws, so his evaluation of Commission conduct has no standard against which to be <br />measured. While Mr. Meehlhause testifies (Tr. Pg. 46, 20) that recruiting "has been a challenge", his <br />comment is not put into any time context, thereby identifying when it was a challenge. Plaintiff's <br />closing argument also claims Mr. Meehlhause as saying recruiting has become "increasingly difficult", <br />whereas this is not supported by the actual text of the hearing testimony. In addition, Mr. Meehlhause <br />has decided he "probably" will not recruit for the Commission at this time, but as a party (City Council <br />member) to this request of Your Honor to remove me from the Commission, I would suggest he has <br />some bias against me. While it is a personal prerogative of Mr. Meehlhause to choose not to recruit, it <br />has no relevance to grounds for my removal. <br />In my Answer and Answer -Amendment, the Court received evidence of the bias of city staff towards <br />me, along with efforts to control the Commission. The Plaintiff in its Letter Attachment 8 admits it <br />controls other Commissions established under Council's authority, and would like to have the Charter <br />Commission use the same procedures and rules. I argue that this is more evidence of the City Council <br />and city staff attempting to control the Commission agenda and amendment proposals. <br />Has the Plaintiff attempted to also apply a conduct standard to other Commission members? Yes. The <br />Court heard testimony from Mr. Zikmund and Mr. Thomas, that initially Plaintiff applied the conduct <br />argument to Mr. Thomas as well, by asking him to resign or be removed by Court order. In the last 9 <br />months, the City has attempted and continues its campaign to fundamentally change the Charter <br />Commission, its membership and makeup. As testified, in October 2018, the City Council <br />recommended to the Court, that Mr. William Doty should not be re -appointed. Moreover, he was not <br />reappointed, though he was interested in continuing. As testified, Mr. Jonathon Thomas received a <br />phone call from City Administrator Zikmund shortly after the June 3rd meeting (as did I), and was <br />asked to resign from the Commission. He and I were both informed that if our resignations were not <br />received by Friday, June 7, the City Council would submit letters to the Court asking for both of us to <br />be removed from our appointments. All three of these Commission members have traits in common; <br />concern for the independent authority of the Commission, and all three are long standing older (age) <br />members of the Commission. Both Mr. Thomas and I have an understanding of statutes, and <br />understand the Commission to be an independent authority, not under the authority of the City Council. <br />We are members who are willing to question the City Council and staff, if necessary, and not simply <br />rubber stamp. <br />5) Defense of My Conduct and actions serving on the Charter Commission <br />Finally, the Court heard testimony and received evidence, which describes my presence and conduct on <br />the Commission. I have been described as professional, courteous, open to dialog, welcoming to all <br />members and it has been stated that my knowledge is an asset to the Commission. The Court also has <br />other reference letters that describe my actions and interactions with other organizations and <br />individuals, as also being courteous, professional and dedicated to following the organization's rules. I <br />Case File: 62-CV 19-4965 Page 8 of 11 <br />