My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Amundsen Ltr to Court Aug 2019
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
Misc.
>
Membership Issues Removal Documents
>
Amundsen Ltr to Court Aug 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2023 12:15:44 PM
Creation date
3/20/2023 12:14:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Charter Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Attachment 1 — Response to City Letter of July 11, 2019 Case File 62-CV-19-4965 <br />why they're not continuing to serve beyond their appointment. <br />Paragraph 4, <br />The Letter states that my conduct and behavior has delayed the Commission in addressing goals and <br />obtaining quorum. <br />• I disagree with the statement. <br />• No examples of my conduct or behavior are provided that supports their statement that I am <br />delaying the Commission or preventing a quorum. <br />• The Commission has not set any goals for itself or been prevented from functioning. <br />• The Commission has not received citizen petitions for review per MN 410.12. <br />• The Commission has not received any Council proposed amendments for review per MN <br />410.12. <br />• I've attended Commission meetings fulfilling my office duties. My intent is to fulfill my duty <br />and to be in attendance at all meetings. <br />The Letter states that the attached data (I assume Letter Attachment 2) shows reductions in <br />Commission membership and inability to reach full complement and that quorum was not achieved in <br />various years. <br />• I disagree with the statement. <br />• The statements of Commission reductions and lack of quorum delaying Commission business is <br />not supported by the facts that the Commission has had a quorum present at its meetings since <br />October 2016, my current appointment start date. <br />• As previously stated, Statute 410 doesn't require a "full compliment" of commissioners to <br />conduct business. <br />• As previously noted Statute 410.05 authorizes the Commission to establish its own quorum. <br />• As previously stated the Bylaws' specification of quorum was changed in Nov 2016 to read: <br />"Section 3. Quorum_ In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 410,05, as amended, a quonim <br />shall be defined as follows: If there are nine (9) qualified and acting members, then five (5) members <br />shall constitute a quorum. If there are less than nine (9) qualified and acting members, then four (4) <br />members shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting the commission's business and <br />exercising its powers and for all other purposes, If the commission lacks a quorum, a smaller number of <br />members may set a time to reconvene the commission, continue to meet as a subcommittee if desired, <br />and report their discussions to the commission." <br />• Prior to 2016 the Commissions 2003 Bylaws Article 3 stated: <br />" Section 3. Quorum. A majority of qualified and acting members shall constitute a quorum for the <br />purpose of conducting the Commission's business and exercising its powers and for all other <br />purposes, but a smaller number of members may adjourn from time to time. " <br />• Prior to 2003 the Commissions 1993 Bylaws Article 3 stated: <br />"Section 3. Quorum, The powers of the Commission shall be vested in the members thereof in office <br />Page 5 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.