Laserfiche WebLink
37 <br />NYLE ZIKMUND - CROSS-EXAMINATION <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />was nine, it's five. I don't know when exactly that <br />bylaw occurred. <br />BY MR. AMUNDSEN: <br />Q So, Mr. Zikmund, when you were preparing the <br />chart that is the city's attachment number two, what <br />standard were you applying to identify quorum? <br />A So give me a specific date, Mr. Amundsen. <br />Q The question is, what standard were you using <br />when developing that chart to define quorum? <br />A The answer is it depends on what date because <br />it had moved, because the commission size moved. <br />Q So -- <br />A So let me answer this way. In 2003 it went <br />from fifteen to eleven members, which means you would <br />have needed six. In 2017 -- <br />Q Let me make it simpler. <br />A -- you went from -- <br />Q Let me make it simpler. <br />THE COURT: Let him finish his answer. <br />THE WITNESS: You went from eleven to nine, <br />which means you needed five. In the fall of 2016, I <br />show in the chart here that the actual number of <br />members on 12/31 in 2016 was five, but two of those <br />members were added at the last meeting. So <br />throughout that year, you had three. In years '14, <br />