Laserfiche WebLink
Background: <br />For more than a decade the City has been unable to meet the service demands of our residents due too <br />its charter levy provision. Of the 853 cities in the State of Minnesota, just over 100 have charters and of <br />those, only 2 have a charter cap levy provision; Mounds View and Fridley. The Mounds View provision is <br />so restrictive that the City is and has been unable to hire a full time employee absent a voter approved <br />referendum, no other city in the State of Minnesota operates under this restriction. <br />Further, increasing regulatory costs, aging infrastructure, and contractual services have increased <br />greater than the rate of inflation. Our sanitary sewer fee to the Met Council is just over $1 million per <br />year. The city is in the midst of a $6 million upgrade to its municipal drinking water plants, all of it <br />related to treatment as more contaminants find their way into our groundwater supplies needing <br />additional cleaning and treatment to ensure safe drinking water. <br />For more than a decade the city has been challenged with using reserves to balance the budget, <br />undertaking the elimination of programs or termination of staff. The challenges are significant as <br />evidenced by the annual reserve contribution is equal to a 4-5% levy amount. Measured in impact it <br />would be a 20% reduction of Public Works staff, 15% reduction in Police Staff, or elimination of the Park <br />and Recreation Programs and Community Center. <br />Since January of 2021, the Charter Commission has been discussing easing of the levy provision <br />contained in Chapter 7, and discussed it in depth at their March 23rd meeting and again at their April 27th <br />meeting where Finance Director Mark Beer provided substantive detail on the looming challenge. In <br />June of 2021, the Commission met with the Council in a workshop setting to discuss their progress and <br />obtain feedback from the council. <br />After further discussion at their September and November meetings, the Commission passed a <br />resolution on a 6-3 vote to amend the levy language and move it forward via the Ordinance process, <br />which is one of multiple ways detailed in State Statute to amend a local charter. <br />Once the resolution was adopted and presented to the City, a precise timeline is set forth in state statue <br />requiring notification of a required hearing and publication of the Ordinance. The public hearing <br />occurred on December 13, 2021 and subsequently the Council adopted the ordinance by a unanimous <br />vote, a required component of the statute when amending the charter by ordinance. Charter <br />amendment votes are the singular unanimous council required votes in state statute. <br />After the hearing, the timeline clock continues in adoption and petition. Opponents to the ordinance <br />have the right to file a petition by a date certain with a requisite number of signatures detailed in <br />statute. In this case, that day is February 22, 2022. Upon receipt the City must determine sufficiency. <br />Depending on the circumstances of when the petition is submitted, if determined insufficient, petioners <br />may have time remaining to file an amended petition or submit an entirely new petition. <br />If a sufficient petition is filed in accordance with statutory timelines, the ordinance is returned to the <br />Council for further action which includes placing it on the ballot at the next general election, calling for a <br />special election, or they could determine to go in a different direction which includes the option of <br />abandoning the effort. If no valid petition is received, the ordinance then becomes effective. That day <br />is March 22A 2022. <br />