My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Community Survey Results
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
05-26-2005
>
Community Survey Results
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2023 1:31:29 PM
Creation date
3/29/2023 1:30:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
04/07/2005 10:37 6129201069 DECISION RESOURCES PAGE 05 <br />17. For road reconstruction, would you CONCRETE .............. 60% <br />prefer CONCRETE curb and gutter OR BITUMINOUS ............ III; <br />BITUMINOUS -- ASPHALT -- curb and NO PREFER19NCE ......... 12% <br />gutter, if the cost to residents NEITHER ................9%r <br />were about same? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 7W <br />18. Do you feel the City is too tough, TOO TOUGH ..............3%- <br />about <br />.............3%- <br />about right or not tough enough in ABOUT RIGHT ........... 58% <br />enforcing the City Code on such NOT TOUGH ENOUGH ...... 33% <br />nuisances as junk cars, messy DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 7% <br />yards, weeds or tall grass, and <br />outside storage? <br />IF "TOO TOUGH" OR "NOT TOUGH ENOUGH," ASK: (N-143) <br />19. Why do you feel that way? <br />UNSURE, 1 ; MESSY YARDS, 20, JUNK CARS, 28�; RUN- <br />DOWN HOUSES, 99s; TOO STRICT/LEAVE OWNERS ALONE, 80; <br />HOMES WITH MULTIPLE CODE VIOLATIONS, 13%-; NEED TOUGH <br />CONSEQUENCES, 9�; TALL GRASS AND WEEDS, 3%-; SCAT- <br />TERED, 11;. <br />20. Would you favor or oppose the City STRONGLY FAVOR........ 25% <br />passing an ordinance that would FAVOR .................251; <br />limit the number of vehicles OPPOSE..... ...... 18% <br />parked on a residential lot? (WAIT STRONGLY OPPOSE ....... 23% - <br />FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... 9% <br />that way? <br />Moving on.... <br />21. Would you favor or oppose an in- FAVOR .................42$ <br />Crease <br />................42%- <br />crease in the city portion of your OPPOSE ................46%, <br />property taxes if cost -of -living DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .... 13§ <br />tax increases were needed to main- <br />tain services at their current <br />level? <br />22. Would you favor or oppose a reduc- FAVOR .................2$%. <br />tion in city services if the city- OPPOSE., .......... 55t <br />portion of your property taxes can DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....17W <br />be reduced? <br />IF "FAVOR," ASK: (N=113) <br />23. What services would you be willing to see cut to keep <br />your property taxes from increasing or to reduce your <br />property taxes? <br />UNSURE, 48%-; NONE, 11%-; ACROSS THE BOARD, 3�; PARKS <br />AND RECREATION, 7%-; ADMINISTRATION, 9�; STREETS, 3%-; <br />POLICE, 7%; SNOW REMOVAL, 9�; GOLF COURSE, 3�; <br />SCATTERED, It-. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.