My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/10/81 Agenda & Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
12/10/81 Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2024 1:46:04 PM
Creation date
4/21/2023 3:14:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
°�°n,b°r, ,s:3 , <br /> I School Talk MOUNDS VIEW PUBUC SCHOOLS <br /> iNDE►ENDEHT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.671 <br /> If pressure was money, the Mounds View School The next five years were in sight when the ' <br /> Board is handling enough these days to take care of School Board reorganized the configuration of grade <br /> District budget problems for a decade. Both the levels at their November 23 meeting. The organ- <br /> "problem budget" for 1982-83 and the pressure for ization that will become effective at the start <br /> immediate decisions it is commanding are being of the 1982-83 school year is K-6 (elementary), <br /> tackled with some far-reaching rr:ult; by District 7-8 (middle/jr. high), and 9-12 (senior high). <br /> decision-makers. • <br /> During the closing days of 1981 and the begin- The plan will maintain as many elementary <br /> ning of 1982, the District 621 School Board and <br /> District administrators will be making decisions school neighborhoods as is feasible <br /> expected to shape the present and future of Mounds <br /> View Public Schools. Grade reorganization was the first of the major <br /> decisions to be made because of the impact grade <br /> The major issues are those of grade reorgan- configuration has on the remaining issues of <br /> ization; building closings; substantial alter- building usage, curriculum and program planning, <br /> ations in programs and services, which include and staff cuts. • . <br /> student activities and athletics; and reductions The plan will maintain as many elementary <br /> to be made in the District 621 staff. school neighborhoods as is feasible, considering <br /> Prompting the crit- such factors as en- <br /> ical need for the de- rollment decline, <br /> visions to be made at boundary adjustments, <br /> this time is a complexECISION long term program <br /> General Fund operating needs of the District, <br /> budget problem for and fiscal responsi- <br /> I982-83 coming as a bility. <br /> resuitof the October 5 The School Board <br /> ,vy referendum failure noted that the grade <br /> the bleak status reorganization could . <br /> stale aid to public result in building en- <br /> education. rollment capacity to <br /> Some schools are to FOR THE 80's be tight in some ele- <br /> be closed for good mentary schools next <br /> this June. A number year, and in the sen- <br /> of teachers will be for high schools for <br /> laid off and others transferred to remaining several years. Overriding considerations favoring <br /> schools. The curriculum to be offered students, the plan were that it creates a grade organization <br /> particularly those in the secondary schools, must that will work in the District for at least five <br /> be set. A scant two months remain to accomplish years, and is a cost effective measure. <br /> these tasks. The grade organization will : <br /> The budget building process for 1982-83 origi- <br /> nally focused on budget cuts of 53.2 million. That • Maintain the neighborhood "feeder concept" of <br /> total has been expanded by about Sl million given the schools with the elementary schools each <br /> channeled into one of two middle/junior high <br /> schools, which would, in turn, be directed <br /> "Short—sighted solutions into either lrondale or Mounds View High <br /> Schools. <br /> simply won't stand the test , <br /> 001L- <br /> of time 4„,•glit,, <br /> Superintendent hurt Nygren 'l'. �;f • Kindergarten students could be instructed in <br /> } 1 .., shifts in the elementary schools rather than <br /> have their classes held in secondary build- - <br /> the erosion of District 621 projected income re- fags. <br /> venue for next year. • Sixth grade students would stay in, or return • <br /> Regardless of why the decisions have to be to, their neighborhood elementary schools. <br /> rDistrict adminiade, it is strationintent otof tmhe akecjrudgmentsdonnd <br /> •,- The grade level organization arrangement would . <br /> ,se <br /> tough issues with a commitment to long- be consistent across the District, permittingm planning. "Short-sighted solutions simply greater uniformity of programs offered to all <br /> ' t stand the test of time," Superintendent students. <br /> Burt Nygren stated at a recent School Board • The accepted plan saves the most dollars for` <br /> meeting. "They may please people initially, the 1982-83 General Fund. Preliminary esti <br /> but public service requires leadership and mates place the savings at about $828,400, • <br /> vision or we condemn those who wool . follow to which includes the closing of two elementary <br /> correcting our problem," 4, -•-id. and two middle/junior high schools. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.