My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/25/81 Agenda & Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
06/25/81 Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2024 1:46:04 PM
Creation date
4/24/2023 2:18:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Parks and Recreation Minutes <br /> Page 5 <br /> June 4, 1981 <br /> Task Force Report (cont. ) A synopsis as to why the referendum may have failed <br /> is as follows: <br /> 1. It was not an emotional issue, too much <br /> apathy. <br /> 2. The general election was a bad time for <br /> the Park Referendum. <br /> 3. The successful school referendum four weeks <br /> prior to the park issue. <br /> 4. The referendum was for too much money. <br /> 5. General status of the economy. <br /> 111 <br /> 6. Trend toward political conservatism. <br /> 7. Concern for how the parks were going to be <br /> maintained. <br /> A motion was made by Linke, seconded by Silvis to accept <br /> and support the reasoning and rationale of Park Referen- <br /> dum Task Force as to why it may have failed. <br /> The motion passed unanimously. <br /> 7 ayes <br /> 0 nayes <br /> A great deal of general discussion then followed regard- <br /> ing the possibility of a referendum in the future. <br /> Issues that were raised: <br /> 1. Referendum should be an emotional item. <br /> 2. Possibly the park shelter buildings should be <br /> condemned and torn down. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.