Laserfiche WebLink
1978 Titee VI C.E.T.A. Grant PnoposcL Page 5 <br /> As .the DiAec ton o4 the s pons ofc,i.ng agency I am awake that this type <br /> 0,6 leis arse dei iveny s e/Lv.iee has not existed .in the past in any 4oI m • <br /> Oh con-text. <br /> In addition we have pehsonatey contacted ,the agencies dvicectey <br /> -involved namely the Mounds View City Council, Mounds View Patchy <br /> and Recjceati.on Commios.ion and the School D-ttci.e,t #621 to d.useuss <br /> the pnoposa! and to solicit th.e 'L .input. We have .included lette)tz <br /> o4 s uppoht and undehstand%ng -in Addendum C. <br /> In addition to contacting the agencies dinectey -involved ,the neigh- <br /> bohhood le.isune council pnoposat has been whitten up .in .the New <br /> Bh.ighton Bueletin which ,ins the o 5 6-i.eiae news paper 4on .the City o6 <br /> Mounds View. <br /> E . EXPLAIN WHY THIS PROJECT CANNOT BE FUNDED WITH EXISTING <br /> FUNDS . <br /> The existing City o4 Mounds View budget -is dominated by the Cities <br /> stagnant geneh.aJ {und hevenue outeoofz. It .ins oney -through h.evis ivnL <br /> made -Ln -the. 1977 Minnesota Legislative session to the loeae gove/Lnment <br /> levy Limitation laws that pIo v.ided s u6 6ie i.en t net ie li to a tow continua- <br /> tion o existing p/wgram and service levetz. <br /> The potential o5 adding additional sta“,ing and progh.ams is not <br /> possible. <br /> 111/1 <br /> The City o4 Mounds View ,v, ph.es en,tey heavity dependent on p/copehvty <br /> -taxes and state aid which pIov-ide aemost 78% os ,the cuAvc.ent genenae <br /> 4und revenues making long /Lange 4onecasting exttLematy diU{y.icu.et. <br /> Changes .in the levy £.i.mitation laws, which cont'of locae government <br /> p/wpelc ty -tax and state aid hevenua, ocean almost annwiUy. <br /> Having discussed .the potential o6 expanding community s eIv,ices in <br /> the {suture with. the City Adminiot-wtoa he has assured me that aethough <br /> the City Counci,e 4-t-tong-Ly suppohts the need son neighborhood le.c:sure <br /> cottnc%es, .the project cooed not be Sunded because os the existing tight <br /> budget within the next three years. <br /> F. HAS THIS PROJECT BEEN FUNDED IN THE PAST BY ANY OTHER C. E. T.A. <br /> PRIME SPONSOR? IF YES, EXPLAIN . <br /> The Mounds View p,'.oposat has not been 4unded by any otheI C.E.T.A. <br /> ph i,me sponsors. <br /> G . IS THE PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO ANY OTHER C. E .T.A. PRIME <br /> SPONSOR OR FUNDING SOURCE? IF YES, TO WHOM? <br /> The Mounds View proposal .is not being submitted to any othe& C.E.T.A. <br /> p)ume sponsors on 4unding source. • <br />