My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-30-86 Agenda & Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
01-30-86 Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2025 12:37:06 PM
Creation date
5/15/2023 1:25:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2- <br />There were a number of questions raised by <br />each of the individuals in attendance ranging <br />from the need for such a facility as well as <br />possible programs that might occur at the <br />facility. 5taff elaborated, indicating that <br />the facility could serve as a year round <br />Eacility saith Che sides coming oFf, thus <br />becoming a open air picnic shelter in the <br />summer time. At [his time, an extensive com- <br />munity survey had not been completed regard- <br />ing the demand for the facility other than <br />informal meetings with repreaentatives from <br />Lake Region Hockey who indicated they would <br />be very supportive of. such a facility. <br />GENBRAL PARK <br />IMPROVEMSNTS <br />F ..: ... <br />Possible programming activities includerent- <br />ing the facility out to large community <br />organizations, exhibite, ar[s and ceafts <br />shows, community festivala such as Featival <br />in the Park, band concerte, roller akating, <br />roller hockey indoor tennis. indoor floor <br />hockey and comm inity fitneas areas. <br />Staff indicated that et this time, he did noc <br />have all the anr wers but rather was looking <br />for conceptual apµrovel with additional detail <br />informatlon to follov ers time permlt- ted. <br />Staff fur!her etatod that Ne also had eome <br />heeitance regardin conetructton of euch a <br />large facility r e no erchitect had been consulted <br />at thte tlm and hr rerommended that <br />some-dolJare be allocnted tor a consul- tant <br />to review Che renderinge Ue they were prepared <br />by Cedar ForeeC Producte and utler Ruilding. <br />The <br />group provided a etcong general concen- sus <br />to the projecc and directad etaEf to con- tinue <br />getting iaformation on the project. Staff <br />revieved r. liet of proposed perk improvements <br />t taling $796,UU0 and indicated thac <br />ie vould be etaEE'a d airn to reduce Ct <br />is amount by a miniinum of $30U UUU eo that the <br />park reEerendum wuuld nut exceed $1.25 million. <br />There wae lengthy dtsc xaton on thia <br />ieeue, with Cl e fnlloaing iteme being cut <br />oc reduced: A. <br />The auxillia y buildt g at Silver Viev Park <br />wae reduced Co $3U,ODU. B. <br />Tree and landscaping in thi⢠amuunt nf SO, <br />ODO was eltminated. C. <br />Picnic tablea were reduced to 7U tabtes at <br />a savings of S10,SUU.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.