Laserfiche WebLink
CRITERIA, ASSUMPTIONS AND DELIMITATIONS <br />ASSUMPTIONS/CRITERIA: <br />NOTE: All recommendations and options included in thc Task Fc rc reoort arc <br />based upon data provided by the School District administration, incTuding <br />6uilding capacities and current and projected student enrollment. <br />1. Atldress current (Fall of 1986) and long-term needs (5 years). <br />2. Staff ratios, Capital Outlay Fund and General Fund viill remain at their• <br />current ievels. <br />3. The shifting of school attendance boundaries •ithin the District is <br />inevitable. <br />4. This is a problem viiich atfects the entir•e :,:•ol District community. <br />5. There will be no single solution which will please the entire constituency <br />6. Equalize the student enrollment/building capacity ratio throughout the <br />District. <br />7. Minimize long-term disruptions to students. <br />8 <br />1 T. <br />Minimize disruptions to educational programs. <br />Minimize transportation costs, travel time and distances. <br />Maximize community acceptance. <br />The District must;provide for allocation of the needs of housing as <br />related to'pre K-12 Special Education Programs in cvoperation with <br />Distr'l t 976 to ensure stabitity in housing those programs. <br />12. Retain the concept of a Community Education program. <br />DELIMITATIONS: <br />1: The Task Force recognizes that due to the timitation ot time, vailabte <br />information and the innereni-un rtainty of predicting long-te n popula- <br />tion fluttuations, combined with the difficulty of forecasting changes <br />in state funding formulas and mandated programs, making definitive <br />recommendations is difficutt. <br />2: The Task Force has not addressed the issues of educatiunal phiJosophies <br />re atetl to grade re-organization. <br />26-