My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/28/92 Agenda & Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
05/28/92 Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2024 2:03:28 PM
Creation date
6/1/2023 12:50:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
StS SmS SmO StO DKR <br /> 29 . Elimination of the subsidy of <br /> • community events, such as <br /> "Festival in the Park, " "Spring <br /> Clean-Up Day, " and "Fall Clean- <br /> Up Day, " saving $21, 000 annually. 18% 32% 27% 18% 5% <br /> 30. Elimination of the planting of <br /> flowers on all city property <br /> except City Hall, saving $3 , 000. 34% 40% 16% 6% 4% <br /> Moving on. . . <br /> The City has eleven parks. <br /> 31. Would you support the elimination STRONGLY SUPPORT 10% <br /> of the park in your neighborhood SUPPORT 8% <br /> if the property could be developed OPPOSE 14% <br /> into homes, thereby returning pro- STRONGLY OPPOSE 64% <br /> perty tax money to the City? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 3% <br /> (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel <br /> strongly that way? <br /> Another possible savings that the City could undertake would be a <br /> reduction in the frequency of the publication of its newsletter. <br /> Currently, the City Charter requires that a newsletter must be <br /> published and mailed to all residents six times per year. <br /> • 32 . Would you favor or oppose a City FAVOR 92% <br /> Charter change reducing the number OPPOSE 8% <br /> of publications to four times each DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0% <br /> . year, saving $7 , 000? <br /> Cities are also looking for alternative means of raising more <br /> revenue. For many communities, alternate sources must be located <br /> to provide an acceptable standard of basic services. Otherwise, <br /> services will be cut or property taxes will be increased. Many <br /> proposals feature "user fees" -- charges made to the user of <br /> specific city and public services. For each of the following <br /> users fee programs, please tell me whether you would strongly <br /> support it, somewhat support it, somewhat oppose it, or strongly <br /> oppose it. <br /> StS SmS Sm0 StO DKR <br /> 33 . A utilities franchise fee of <br /> a maximum of four percent based <br /> on energy usage and raising <br /> electric/gas bills on average <br /> by $5. 00 to $10. 00 per month, <br /> raising approximately $250, 000 <br /> annually for General Fund use. 7% 26% 22% 41% 4% <br /> 34 . A street light usage fee costing <br /> • homeowners about $1.23 per month. 22% 33% 15% 27% 4% <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.