My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/28/92 Agenda & Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
05/28/92 Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2024 2:03:28 PM
Creation date
6/1/2023 12:50:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
45. Would you still favor a re- STILL FAVOR 12% <br /> duction even if liability NO 16% <br /> risks increased because of DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 3% <br /> potential accidents? <br /> • 46. Would you favor or oppose a re- STRONGLY FAVOR 11% <br /> duction in the maintenance of the FAVOR 23% <br /> physical appearance of the parks OPPOSE 31% <br /> as a cost-savings measure, even if STRONGLY OPPOSE 27% <br /> the appearance of the parks DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 8% <br /> changed? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do <br /> you feel strongly that way? <br /> Moving on. . . . <br /> The City of Mounds View presently operates Lakeside Park under a <br /> joint powers agreement with the City of Spring Lake Park. This <br /> body of water is the only natural water source in the community. <br /> A beach has been developed there, but staffing of lifeguards may <br /> not be possible in the future because of budget reductions. <br /> Staffing by lifeguards would cost the City approximately <br /> $3 , 000. 00. <br /> 47 . Would you favor or oppose the con- STRONGLY FAVOR 42% <br /> tinued staffing of lifeguards FAVOR 22% <br /> during the summer months at the OPPOSE 17% <br /> Lakeside Park Beach? (WAIT FOR STRONGLY OPPOSE 12% <br /> RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 7% <br /> that way? <br /> • Changing topics. . . . <br /> There has been much discussion about the re-development of the <br /> Highway 10 corridor in Mounds View. <br /> 48 . If you could choose the type of development there, what type <br /> would you most favor? <br /> NO ANSWER, 53%; OFFICE, 3%; SMALL BUSINESS, 14%; COMMER- <br /> CIAL, 4%; GROCERY, 3%; RESIDENTIAL, 3% ; RETAIL, 6%; <br /> INDUSTRIAL, 2%; PARKS, 3%; WIDEN HIGHWAY, 3%; MORE <br /> TRAFFIC LIGHTS, 3%; SCATTERED, 3%. <br /> 49. What type of development would you not want to see there? <br /> NO ANSWER, 42%; BARS, "ADULT" ENTERTAINMENT, 19%; MULTIPLE <br /> HOUSING, 5%; CAR LOTS, 4%; COMMERCIAL, 5%; SHOPPING <br /> CENTER, 4%; FAST FOOD, 2% ; GAS STATION, 1%; TRAFFIC <br /> GENERATING, 3%; SCATTERED, 2%. <br /> One proposal would convert Highway 10 into a pedestrian-oriented <br /> boulevard. More service-oriented business establishments would <br /> be sited there. The speed limit would be lowered, and bicycle <br /> and pedestrian paths added. <br /> • <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.