Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />4. Performance evaluations <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, <br />A public body may close a meeting to evaluate the performance of an <br />subds. 1(d), 3(a). See DPO <br />14-007, DPO 15-002, and <br />individual who is subject to its authority. The public body must identify the <br />DPO 16-002 (discussing <br />individual to be evaluated before closing the meeting. <br />what type of summary <br />satisfies the open meeting <br />law). <br />DPO 05-013 (advising that <br />At its next open meeting, the public body must summarize its conclusions <br />a government entity could <br />close a meeting under this <br />regarding the evaluation. This type of meeting must be open at the request <br />exception to discuss its <br />of the individual who is the subject of the meeting. If this type of meeting is <br />contract with an <br />independent contractor <br />closed, it must be electronically recorded, and the recording must be <br />when that contractor is an <br />preserved for at least three years after the meeting. <br />individual human being). <br />5. Attorney -client privilege <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. <br />A meeting may be closed if permitted by the attorney -client privilege. <br />Brainerd Daily Dispatch, <br />Meetings between a government body and its attorney to discuss active or <br />LLC v. Dehen, 693 N.W.2d <br />threatened litigation may only be closed, under the attorney -client privilege, <br />435 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005). <br />Prior Lake American v. <br />when a balancing of the purposes served by the attorney -client privilege <br />Mader, 642 N.W.2d 729 <br />against those served by the open meeting law dictates the need for absolute <br />(Minn. 2002). Northwest <br />Publications, Inc. v. City of <br />confidentiality. <br />St. Paul, 435 N.W.2d 64 <br />(Minn. Ct. App. 1989). <br />Minneapolis Star & <br />The need for absolute confidentiality should relate to litigation strategy and <br />Tribune v. Housing and <br />Redevelopment Authority in <br />will usually arise only after the city has made a substantive decision on the <br />and for the City of <br />underlying matter. This privilege may not be abused to suppress public <br />Minneapolis, 251 N.W.2d <br />620 (Minn.1976). <br />observations of the decision -making process and does not include situations <br />DPO 14-005. DPO 14-017. <br />where the council will be receiving general legal opinions and advice on the <br />DPO 16-003. DPO 17-003. <br />strengths and weaknesses of a proposed underlying action that may give <br />rise to future litigation. <br />6. Purchase or sale of real or personal property <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. <br />A public body may close a meeting to: <br />3 (c). <br />• Determine the asking price for real or personal property to be sold by <br />the public body. <br />Minn. Stat. § 13.44, subd. <br />• Review confidential or protected nonpublic appraisal data. <br />3. <br />• Develop or consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase or sale of <br />real or personal property. <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. <br />Before holding a closed meeting under this exception, the public body must <br />3 (c). <br />identify on the record the particular real or personal property that is the <br />subject of the closed meeting. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 8/30/2022 <br />Meetings, Motions, Resolutions, and Ordinances Chapter 7 1 Page 17 <br />