Laserfiche WebLink
I wanted to bring to your attention a couple things that have come to my attention, and which I have <br />commented on in the MV Resident FB page. But obviously I can't assume you see all that is mentioned <br />there, so wanted to bring it to your attention. <br />Somewhere along the way, it seems that residents have not been permitted to speak or comment at <br />Council work sessions. I know they are not council meetings, and the reason was probably to move the <br />meetings along more quickly. However, our city charter speaks to this issue and is very clear. <br />Under Our city Charter, Chapter 3 section 3.01, Council Procedure, it states "During any of its public <br />meetings, the Council shall not prohibit, but may place reasonable restrictions upon citizen's comments <br />and questions." Work sessions are public meetings, which means that the council cannot prohibit <br />citizen's comments and questions. I was not able to make it to the work session this week, but I <br />understand comments were not allowed. This is a violation of our city charter. <br />In addition, it concerns me, and other residents that work session records of what actually happens, are <br />no longer being kept. As a community that has always prided itself in being transparent, this is not <br />transparent. The sessions are not recorded and no notes from the meeting activity are being kept (per <br />an email from Nyle). I checked on other city websites, and every city I checked (all in Ramsey county) do <br />post minutes from their council work sessions. <br />So I checked with the state data practices office and was told on two different occasions that there is a <br />statute (MN Statute 15.17 Sub. 1) that requires records be kept. I did ask Nyle about this also, and his <br />response was that the agenda and packet are all that is being kept for this requirement. However, that <br />is not a record of what ACTUALLY occurred at the meeting, simply the plan for the meeting. The statute <br />states the full and accurate records be kept. See below for exact wording in the statute: <br />15.17 OFFICIAL RECORDS. <br />§Subdivision 1.Must be kept. All officers and agencies of the state, counties, cities, towns, school <br />districts, municipal subdivisions or corporations, or other public authorities or political entities within <br />the state, hereinafter "public officer," shall make and preserve all records necessary to a full and <br />accurate knowledge of their official activities. <br />I would like to request that these 2 issues be placed on the council agenda soon. I know I am not the <br />only one who would like to see both of these practices changed back to how they were in the past. In <br />my opinion, it doesn't look like the council has a choice in this, they are both required at this time. <br />I don't believe the changes were done for any nefarious reason, probably just to save money. However, <br />having an informed and engaged public is a good thing in government and certainly our city. <br />I look forward to a response when you are able. Thank you for serving our lovely little city. <br />Best wishes, <br />Valerie Amundsen <br />God bless your Day! <br />