My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-2023 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
06-26-2023 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:24:35 AM
Creation date
7/19/2023 10:17:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
6/26/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Minutes
Date
6/26/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 26, 2023 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn asked for the cities that have organized pickup, what are some of the <br />services the residents wanted. <br /> <br />Mr. Wiggins explained his two cities, Champlin and Ham Lake, have had organized collection <br />since people have lived in the community. He noted he does not get complaints other than when <br />the city forced Ace to collect payment. <br /> <br />Jamie Pierce, General Manager for Republic Services, arrived at the meeting and introduced <br />herself to the City Council. She noted she was not against organized collection noting she had a <br />lot of contracts. She indicated the problem with consortiums was that all of the haulers were <br />competitors. <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn asked that the attorney speak to the difference between organized <br />collection and a consortium. <br /> <br />Assistant City Attorney Tierney stated they were somewhat the same thing. She noted organized <br />collection is when the City hires a single hauler and the City controls the hauling. She reported a <br />consortium would mean the haulers form an organization and they provide services to the City. <br />She indicated after a contract is signed, the City would allow the haulers to divide the City on how <br />it could best be served based on their current market share. <br /> <br />Council Member Lindstrom stated he understood some of the haulers do not approve of organized <br />trash collection. He asked if the haulers did see any benefits from the contracts they had in place. <br /> <br />Ms. Pierce reported there was more efficiency, but contracts did not allow companies to grow. <br /> <br />Mr. Delaforest commented on how a contract was only in place for seven years and there was no <br />compensation after that time. He stated there was a tremendous amount of risk involved in <br />contracts when it comes to equipment and employees. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Meehlhause thanked Mr. Delaforest for this comment and noted he was uncertain <br />where the City would be in seven years with respect to trash hauling. He explained the City was <br />collecting data from residents through a community survey. He encouraged residents to complete <br />a survey if they have not done so already. He reported the Council would be discussing trash <br />collection further at the July 5 work session meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Delaforest encouraged the City to contact Golden Valley to discuss how they altered their <br />trash hauler licenses. <br /> <br />Ms. Parkos commented on how a consortium would not work for her company. She hoped the <br />Council would opt to maintain an open market for trash collection in Mounds View. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Meehlhause thanked the trash haulers for their attendance at this meeting. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Meehlhause recessed the City Council meeting at 6:47 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.