Laserfiche WebLink
Item 2 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Accessory structures are only allowed in the rear <br />Most yards are large enough to accommodate an <br />yard of properties in the city. <br />accessory building in the backyard. There are a <br />handful of older homes (1930's) that may have <br />been built prior to current lot lines, and have large <br />front yards and tiny backyards. In these cases, a <br />Variance may be justified to build an Accessory <br />Building in the frontyard. <br />OPPORTUNTITIES <br />More clearly address urban agriculture in the city <br />This is not a problem that needs to be solved. If a <br />code by explicitly stating how different forms of <br />resident would like to convert their entire yard into <br />urban agriculture are allowed in various zoning <br />a garden, there is not a need to regulate the <br />districts. <br />garden, so much as regulate the nuisance (e.g. <br />noxious weeds, yard waste, etc. <br />Make keeping fowl and bees more accessible by <br />The City Council has given a lot of thought to the <br />decreasing application requirements and fees. <br />licensing of chickens, ducks, and bees. License <br />Expand the types of animals that residents can <br />fees are intended to be equivalent to the City's <br />have by creating standards for keeping other <br />cost of administering the license program. <br />appropriate livestock. <br />If expanding the type of permitted non - <br />domesticated animals, consideration needs to be <br />given as to the potential of nuisances, e.g. noise, <br />waste management, attraction of rodents, etc. <br />If the intention of keeping chickens and ducks is to <br />produce eggs, and the keeping of bees is to <br />produce honey, what other animals produce a <br />product, such as dairy, wool, meat, skins, etc. and <br />are these types of animals appropriate in Mounds <br />View? <br />How are deceased animals disposed of (e.g. <br />discarding a 5 lbs. chicken vs. a 1,000 lbs. cow)? <br />Consider incorporating urban agriculture into <br />(see previous comments). <br />public/institutional open spaces, for example at a <br />school or at some of the many parks in the city. <br />Abiding Savior and Edgewood Middle School <br />sponsor community gardens. <br />Decrease barriers to water access by allowing <br />(see previous comments) <br />residents to draw water from any hydrant and <br />making obtaining a permit straightforward and <br />affordable. <br />Urban agriculture requires infrastructure and <br />City Code is specific to prohibiting noxious weeds <br />plants that may not be common in the city and <br />as defined in City Code, along with height limits <br />may not meet public nuisance regulations, but <br />within the right-of-way and 30' sight triangle of <br />generally would not have a negative impact on the <br />intersections. <br />public. Consider potential benefits of the <br />infrastructure/plant growth when evaluating these <br />cases. <br />Adjust public vegetation regulations to facilitate <br />This is more relevant to the location of public <br />collective food production and consumption in <br />gardens, e.g. where is it most appropriate to <br />public spaces while still protecting other <br />permit 10' tall sunflowers or corn stalks (e.g. not <br />vegetation and structures. <br />ad acent to an intersection). <br />Allow accessory structures to be located <br />This is more specific to owners of double lots, and <br />anywhere on property and do not require the <br />owners of vacant landlocked parcels. The owners <br />presence of a primary structure in order for a lot to <br />of double lots have the option to combine their lots <br />have an accessory structure. This will create <br />into one, thereby having the ability to build an <br />greater flexibility for urban agriculture <br />accessory structure in that yard. There has been <br />I Fie MuUnub V Iew V lblun <br />A Thriving Desirable Community <br />