My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2023/08/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
Minutes - 2023/08/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:24:52 AM
Creation date
8/29/2023 1:59:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/14/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Minutes
Date
8/14/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 14, 2023 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Meehlhause asked if Assistant City Administrator Beeman would be attending the <br />Planning Commission meetings. City Administrator Zikmund believed this would not be the case. <br /> <br />Valerie Amundsen, 3048 Woodale Drive, questioned if this contract would cost the City more than <br />hiring someone full time. She inquired if this was a good fiscal decision. City Attorney Riggs <br />reported many cities hire consultants during an interim period while they conduct a search for a <br />new candidate. City Administrator Zikmund stated it was not easy to hire a planner and the City <br />needed time to evaluate the position. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Meehlhause discussed the work being done by Community Development Director <br />Sevald at this time, noting he served as the City Planner and the Community Development Director <br />who oversees three employees. He explained the consulting planner would not be responsible for <br />overseeing these employees, but rather this responsibility was going to be assumed temporarily by <br />Assistant City Administrator Beeman. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Lindstrom/Cermak. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9796, <br />Approving contract services with Stantec for City Planner services. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />I. Second Reading, Ordinance 1007, Prohibiting use of Cannabis in Public <br />Places. ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs requested the Council adopt an ordinance prohibiting the use of cannabis in <br />public places. He explained the Council introduced this ordinance at the August 7 Special City <br />Council meeting. He commented further on the ordinance and definitions for public places. He <br />explained State Statute defines public places more as a setback situation or distance requirement <br />from certain places. He reported the cannabis act contains significant language on what a public <br />place is and State law worked to protect minors. He reiterated that this ordinance was a tool relative <br />to where usage can be made so the police department can educate people. He indicated the use of <br />cannabis in a public place was not a criminal act, but rather was a petty misdemeanor. He <br />commented further on the proposed ordinance and recommended approval. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Meehlhause requested staff speak to the medical marijuana exception. City Attorney <br />Riggs reviewed the language within the ordinance that addressed medical marijuana usage. <br /> <br />Council Member Lindstrom reported he liked the distance suggestion better than a flat out ban. He <br />reiterated that the intent of the State legislation was to protect minors. City Attorney Riggs <br />commented this ordinance would be a tool that the Council could enact. It was noted the council <br />could take their time when approving and considering the final language. <br /> <br />Joyce Jones Strait, 7728 Knollwood, asked how a person was to know where a home daycare was <br />located and questioned if both commercial and home daycares would have prohibited use. City <br />Attorney Riggs explained both commercial and home daycares were included within the <br />ordinance. He stated this regulation came down from the state and marijuana use was not allowed
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.