Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 14, 2023 <br />Regular Meeting Page 16 <br />1 for about two hours. He noted the concerns voiced from these residents had to do with the color of <br />2 the wall, trees, lighting and fence height. He shared with the neighbors that they were not all on <br />3 the same page. He explained the retaining wall would be sealed at this time and would remain the <br />4 color of concrete. He reported staff made a commitment to revisit with these residents in one year. <br />6 Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson indicated the sealer came out more white <br />7 than staff anticipated and he had spoken with the contractor to see if it could be reapplied. <br />9 City Administrator Zikmund commented trees were being addressed with the residents on a per <br />10 lot basis and noted staff would have to speak with the DNR about tree placement. He stated the <br />11 last issue of concern from the neighbors was that they would no longer have access to the lake. He <br />12 explained the residents now had a four foot cliff. The residents requested steps be installed in order <br />13 to allow residents to access the lake. He indicated he would have to investigate this further because <br />14 this was not City property. In addition, he would be speaking with the DNR on how to address this <br />15 concern. <br />16 <br />17 Acting Mayor Meehlhause clarified the fence could not be three feet but rather would have to <br />18 remain four feet. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson reported this was the case. <br />19 <br />20 Council Member Lindstrom questioned if the exposed brick counted in the total fence height. <br />21 Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson explained the fence height would be four <br />22 feet but would be staggered along the retaining wall. He noted as the retaining wall drops, the <br />23 fence height would also drop. <br />24 <br />25 City Administrator Zikmund commented further on how the southern properties would have access <br />26 to the lake. He reiterated that there can be no activity or changes made within the OHW. <br />27 <br />28 Council Member Lindstrom stated a lot of the frustration from the community was misplaced. He <br />29 thanked Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson for his efforts on this street project. <br />30 He apologized to Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson for the comments that <br />31 were directed to him stating this was unfair. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson <br />32 thanked Council Member Lindstrom for this and discussed how he has always worked to leave <br />33 infrastructure in a better state than it was when he started a project. <br />34 <br />35 Further discussion ensued regarding an infrastructure correction that would be required. <br />36 <br />37 Acting Mayor Meehlhause thanked Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson for the <br />38 thorough update on the Spring Lake Road and Pleasant View projects. <br />39 <br />40 Rene Johnson, 7385 Pleasant View Drive, commented on how the City set a mailbox standard <br />41 before Ring cameras and mailbox thefts. She encouraged the Council to consider allowing City <br />42 posts to be installed on each residential property along Pleasant View in order to allow residents <br />43 to monitor their mailboxes. She believed this would make the residents feel heard and would <br />44 provide greater security for the mail. <br />45 <br />46 Community Development Director Sevald provided the Council with an update on the Villas of <br />