My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-2023
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
04-19-2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 11:45:09 AM
Creation date
9/13/2023 11:45:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 19, 2023 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Commissioner Farmer asked if some sort of ratio should be used for wall signs. Community <br />Development Director Sevald reported this type of formula was more fair, but put more onus on <br />the building owner. He commented on how he liked having specific square footage in place <br />because this ensured murals were not painted onto an entire building wall. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson suggested the language allow for up to 200 square feet or no more than <br />40% of the wall surface for wall signs. Community Development Director Sevald explained this <br />language would be similar to the City of New Brighton ordinance. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Commission was to support the proposed change for wall signs allowing up <br />to 200 square feet for wall signs ,or no more than 40% of the wall surface, whichever is smaller. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sevald requested further comment regarding projection and <br />roof signs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson stated he supported projection and roof signs being 10 feet tall. The <br />Commission was in agreement. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sevald requested feedback on how masonry on monument <br />signs should be addressed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson was of the opinion the BioLife sign had the proper brick base, as an <br />example. <br /> <br />Commissioner Munson reported she supported requiring landscaping surrounding the masonry <br />work on monument signs. <br /> <br />The Commission supported all monument signs have a brick or masonry base. In addition, the <br />Commission supported allowing ground signs to be 16 feet tall. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sevald discussed the regulations in place for temporary non- <br />commercial signs. He stated the recommendation was any number of signs with a combined size <br />of 9 square feet, and no campaign signs are allowed in the right of way. <br /> <br />The Commission supported the language as stated for temporary non-commercial signs. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sevald questioned how the Commission wanted to proceed <br />with The Bear Lot bear sign. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson suggested signs like this come before the Commission for a variance. <br />He did not support any building have any inflatable on their roof. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson agreed this type of sign should come before the Commission for special <br />consideration. He asked if the Mermaid sign could be reinstalled. Community Development
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.