Laserfiche WebLink
12/27/22, 10:55 AM <br />Is it time for Minnesota to give up on PUDs? Some developers and city officials think so <br />ADVERTISEMENT <br />Such market dynamics led Edina officials to create 13 PUDs since 2010. Cary Teague, the <br />city's community development director, told a meeting of the Sensible Land Use <br />Coalition last week that PUDs remain an essential tool for projects such as Market <br />Street. In that effort, developers Saturday Properties and Buhl Investors are redeveloping <br />an underused area of city -owned parking ramps into a mixed -use project with 110 new <br />residential units and 35,000 square feet of new retail. <br />"The PUD process allowed both sides to negotiate benefits and trade-offs," Teague said. <br />"For instance, in exchange for allowing them to have increased density and building <br />heights, the city is gaining nearly an acre of public space with a new plaza, new indoor <br />parking, as well as some affordable housing units." <br />While still operating as intended for big mixed -use projects, the PUD option is being <br />relied on too heavily by suburban cities when it comes to changing tastes in the single- <br />family residential market, said Ben Schmidt, a vice president with the Excelsior Group, <br />one of the Twin Cities' most active homebuilders. <br />The problem, he told the land -use group, is the burgeoning popularity of the new <br />"detached townhome" or "villa -style" housing product. These are single-family homes <br />built on their own lots, but are different from traditional suburban homes in that they <br />are smaller and have just one level, thus appealing to retiring baby boomers who don't <br />want to climb stairs. <br />Their lots are small, sometimes only 40 feet in width, which is far narrower than <br />allowed in most city zoning codes. This is requiring nearly every new residential <br />development, such as Excelsior Group's 319-lot Adelaide Landing in Hugo, to go through <br />the sometimes -lengthy process of obtaining a PUD zoning designation. <br />"In Hugo, for example, we're including a variety of housing types, which would be very <br />difficult to accomplish with `straight' zoning," Schmidt said. "But the PUD requirements <br />raise costs to the homebuilder, who is already operating at very thin margins and is <br />seeing the cost benefits of building on smaller lots being offset." <br />Instead, he urged city officials in the group to consider updating their underlying zoning <br />codes to allow for the now -in -demand narrower lots, rather than having to continually <br />resort to the PUD process. <br />Don Jacobson is a freelance writer based in St. Paul. He is the former editor of the <br />Minneapolis -St. Paul Real Estate Journal. <br />EXCELSIOR GROUP <br />Excelsior Group's Adelaide Landing single-family <br />residential neighborhood in Hugo is typical of <br />many new subdivisions because it needed a <br />https://www.startribune.com/is-it-time-for-minnesota-to-give-up-on-puds-some-developers-and-city-officials-think-so/432980353/ 2/3 <br />