Laserfiche WebLink
for the improvement, the Council shall not make such improvement at the expense of the property benefited, <br />unless, in the meantime, there be filed with the Council a petition asking that the improvement be made, <br />signed by property owners proposed to be assessed for such improvement at least equal in number to those <br />who signed the petition against the improvement; in which event the Council may disregard the petition <br />against the improvement. Any person whose name appears on a petition to the Council for a local <br />improvement, or on a petition to the Council against a local improvement, may withdraw their name by a <br />statement in writing filed with the Council before such petition is presented to the Council. <br />Subdivision 2. Regardless of the provisions in Subdivision 1, when less than 100 percent 100% of the <br />estimated cost of a proposed local improvement is to be paid for by special assessment, within the sixty --day <br />60-day)period after a public hearing has been held on the proposed improvement, a petition may be filed <br />with the Council, signed by a majority of the number of electors who voted for Mmayor in the last regular <br />municipal election, protesting against either the improvement, or the assessment formula, or both. In this <br />event, the Council shall not proceed with the improvement, as proposed. <br />Subdivision 3. When a proposed improvement is allowed under the foregoing subdivisions the Council may <br />proceed at any time between sixty (60) days and one year after the public hearing on the improvement. <br />However, no contract shall be let in the event that the current proposed contract exceeds the estimated cost <br />by more than ten percent 1( 0%�. <br />Subdivision 4. When a proposed improvement is disallowed under the foregoing subdivisions, the Council <br />shall not vote on the same improvement within a period of one year after the public hearing on said <br />improvement. <br />Section 8.06. Certification of Administrative Offense Penalties. Authority is granted to the City of Mounds <br />view to certify unpaid property -based Aadministrative Ooffense penalties by certification to property taxes. <br />Collection of Aadministrative Ooffense penalties shall proceed only in accordance with an ordinance adopted <br />by the Council that must require at least the following: <br />The City must give notice to the property owner listed on the official tax records at least 30(thirty) <br />days prior to imposing the certification. <br />The City must attempt to obtain voluntary payment of the fees and penalties and allow the property <br />owner the opportunity to request certification to the property taxes as a method of payment. The City <br />must provide an opportunity for a hearing regarding the certification before either the C4�-Council or <br />a neutral third party as specified in City Code. <br />Administrative Ooffense penalties and charges must be directly related to the property being assessed <br />according to City Code and as published in the fee schedule. Certifications under this ordinance shall be <br />imposed pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes including sections 366.011, 366.012, 415.01, and 429.101, as <br />amended and as specified in City Code. (Amended 2008 Ord. 810 „adopted T„i„ 2g 2008 ) <br />Section 9.01. Acquisition of Property. The City may acquire by purchase, gift, condemnation, or otherwise, <br />any real property, either within or without its boundaries that may be needed by the City for any public <br />purpose. In acquiring property by exercising the power of eminent domain, the City shall proceed according <br />to Minnesota la ,Statutes, gGhapter 117, as amended, or other applicable items. (Amended 2005 Ord. 749. <br />by Ordl ee:749; Adopted -September- ,2004; F'T-- Oetober13, 200). <br />Page 15 of 19 <br />DOCS OPEN\MU210\4\903732.v2-9/20/23 <br />