My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2023-10-04 PC Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
2023-10-04 PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2024 2:19:52 PM
Creation date
12/27/2023 1:16:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Planning Commission
DOC TYPE
PACKETS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Staff Report <br />10/04/2023 — Eklund, Administrative Variance, 8421 Spring Lake Road <br />Page 2 <br />meet the required 10-ft side setback. The existing driveway is a legal non -conforming use and can <br />remain but may not be expanded without a variance. In this case, the property owner wants to <br />modify the driveway by adding surface that is within the 10-ft setback — to within 1 ft of the <br />property line — which requires a variance. It can be approved with an Administrative Variance per <br />Section 160.470 (code excerpt attached). <br />Existing Driveway <br />Part of the driveway is an existing non -conforming use, being inside the required 10-foot setback. <br />This meets one of the criteria for an Administrative Variance in 160.470 (A)(2). <br />In Harmony with Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan <br />The property and request are in line with the comp plan and zoning code. <br />Reasonable Manner <br />The use of the property for a driveway is reasonable and typical. <br />Unique Circumstances <br />The unique circumstances with this driveway are that there is existing pavement out to the lot line, <br />within the required setback, but not an area large enough for reasonable access and turnaround, <br />including handicapped access. This is a pre-existing condition not created by the applicant. There <br />are practical difficulties to meeting the ordinance: having all pavement meet the 10-ft setback <br />would create an awkward space on the driveway that would be difficult to use. <br />Character of the Locality <br />The driveway modifications will be barely visible to surrounding property owners and will not <br />change the character of the locality. <br />Minimum Variance <br />The request is very modest and is the minimum needed to create a reasonable space for <br />accessing the vehicles. <br />Economic Considerations <br />This criterion typically means that the applicant could meet the ordinance if they spent more <br />money. That is not the case here and this criterion does not apply. <br />The new driveway would be 26'-3" wide. A small portion of the existing driveway beyond that <br />width would be removed and another part of the area that is now bare dirt would be paved with <br />new asphalt. The new revised edge of the driveway would be 1 ft from the side property line to the <br />north. The new north side of the driveway is 27' long, stopping 8' from the existing garage apron. <br />The plans are illustrated on the next page. <br />Design with community in mind <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.