Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 6C <br />Meeting Date Jan. 22, 2024 <br />Type of Business: Council Business <br />City Administrator Review: <br />of Mounds View Staff R <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator <br />Scott J. Riggs, City Attorney <br />Item Title/Subject: R9866 and R9867 - Long Lake Woods Second Addition <br />(Development Agreement and Tax Forfeited Land <br />Acquisition) <br />Introduction: <br />Since at least 2019, the City has been working with a group of property owners and <br />developer Marty Harstad to extend Greenwood Drive north of Sherwood Road and create <br />an infill development consisting of single-family lots to be tentatively named Long Lake <br />Woods Second Addition (the "Project"). The City Council has been supportive of the <br />Project, including recently the adoption of Resolution 9799 (Aug. 28, 2023) authorizing <br />acquisition of specific real property interests needed for the Project by negotiation or <br />eminent domain. <br />Discussion: <br />Although a development agreement for the Project was reviewed and approved in <br />February of 2020, that document was never finalized due to Project delays that were <br />caused by various reasons. Since 2020, details related to the Project have evolved and <br />become more refined. As such, the development agreement has similarly evolved into <br />an updated form which is presented for approval. The agreement has been negotiated <br />with the developer and approval is recommended by staff, including legal counsel. <br />Additionally, in conducting title research related to the Project, it was discovered that a <br />small strip of property which had been assumed to be existing right-of-way is in fact owned <br />by the State of Minnesota via historic tax forfeitures. The property is a 30-foot strip, <br />approximately 548 feet long, which is believed to have been reserved by the State for the <br />future extension of Greenwood Drive. The City needs this strip of property in order to <br />construct the Project as designed. <br />Because the City proposes to use the property for constructing public improvements — a <br />public street and related utilities — the City is eligible to obtain a conditional deed to the <br />property at no cost other than the nominal transactional fees involved. If the application <br />is approved, the City would need to pay the application fees and would obtain the deed. <br />The City would then have three years to construct the public improvements (or facilitate <br />such construction through a private developer) to satisfy the condition. If the <br />improvements are not constructed, ownership of the property would revert back to the <br />State. <br />MU210-262-928001.v2 <br />