My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-05-2024 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
02-05-2024 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:17 PM
Creation date
2/5/2024 10:04:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/5/2024
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
2/5/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Kusina, Filipino Village, EZ Grocery Market, and Pink Flower have requested/made application but the funds have <br />been exhausted. <br /> <br />We also have the $50K loan program but only $9,000 of that is currently available. As funds from this loan program <br />were used for the Forgivable Loan Program instead. As previously, the Council had agreed to increase the EDA <br />levy from $100,000 to $150,000 which was in the approved Strategic Plan. However, the Council did not increase <br />the EDA levy in order to keep the overall levy where the Council desired causing a shortfall in the EDA loan <br />program. Currently, we have three applicants for this program, EZ Market, Big Dipper, and the Sandwich King. <br /> <br />The current EDA Balance is $502,000 (and two residential properties we recently purchased). <br /> <br />Staff is bringing the issue forward for council to discuss further to determine if they want to add additional monies <br />to this program while simultaneously reviewing the program guidelines and parameters which are included as <br />attachments. <br />ACTION REQUESTED – Council consensus, direction on transferring money to either programs and if <br />consensus to determine if there are any changes to the policy. <br /> <br />6. Street Reconstruction – Driveway Conformance – Don <br />Council Member Meehlhause requested we visit this issue further. The specific issue if enforcement of <br />the Driveway Standards/Ordinance. There are approximately 80 non-conforming. The curb is in good <br />to very good condition and is not planned to be replaced. Thus, bringing the driveways into <br />conformance will result in a number of saw cuts (back to the closest joint). <br />The driveway standards are in place to ensure a functional minimum along with a maximum width to <br />ensure we do not have concrete yards or excessive vehicle/boat/RV storage occurring in the front yard. <br />This project will improve the life of the street another 20 years at which time the curb is more likely to <br />need replacement and council can choose to wait until then. <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Provide staff direction on driveway conformance code. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.