Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 25, 2024 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />offer from the haulers was interesting as it changed the structure of the proposal in a meaningful <br />way. She stated the proposal provided a fee for picking up the trash throughout the City but then <br />proposed the City pay the disposal fee. She reported this would increase the overall fees charged <br />by the City to residents and would increase administrative time to manage garbage hauling. She <br />explained throughout the negotiation process, the City has made it clear to the haulers that they <br />were to make their money on the actual picking up of the trash and not the disposal. She stated <br />the proposed bid would have the haulers sending out bills for half of the work and the disposal fee <br />would then have to be charged by the City. <br /> <br />City Attorney Tierney indicated comparisons were run for the prices from the haulers and a <br />spreadsheet was provided to the Council. She reviewed this spreadsheet in further detail with the <br />Council. Based on this information staff has prepared two Resolutions for the Council to consider. <br />She explained the Council could terminate negotiations with the haulers and pursue request for <br />proposals. The other option available to the Council would be to continue negotiations with a <br />deadline of May 13. <br /> <br />Mayor Lindstrom asked if the City Attorney had ever seen a contract where the haulers require the <br />City to pay the disposal fee. City Attorney Tierney stated this was not unheard of. She indicated <br />the City of White Bear Lake has this arrangement. However in this case, it appears that White <br />Bear Lake is paying the disposal rates, versus passing them along to its residents. <br /> <br />Mayor Lindstrom indicated the first proposal that was put in front of the City was still higher than <br />what they were charging other cities with the disposal fee. He feared the proposal really missed <br />the mark on where the City was trying to get to and there would be no lowering of costs. He asked <br />how the Council wanted to proceed with this matter. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9890, <br />Ending Negotiations with the Current Licensed Haulers and Directing Staff to Convene the <br />Organized Collection Options Committee. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause explained the City was asked to make a counter offer from the <br />haulers original offer. He stated this rate was similar to the rate charged to the City of St. Anthony <br />and the haulers choose to not support this offer. This said to him that further negotiations would <br />not lead to the St. Anthony pricing. <br /> <br />Mayor Lindstrom reported the City has been clear about its expectations. He expressed frustration <br />with the fact the haulers came back to the City saying they were going to do nothing. He did not <br />see that the haulers were making substantive movement in the right direction and therefore he <br />supported the City ending negotiations. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />9. REPORTS <br />A. Reports of Mayor and Council. <br />